Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho Subject: Re: Fans ARE FURIOUS At Billie Piper As Doctor Who Revelation From BBC Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2025 22:28:27 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 29 Message-ID: <1021b98$31ik9$1@dont-email.me> References: <101pd77$pv5h$14@dont-email.me> <101s18j$1gp0p$4@dont-email.me> <101skig$1lqq6$4@dont-email.me> <101uta3$270$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2025 14:28:24 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3bfd8eaa1584c13ffce344aa68fdc68d"; logging-data="3197577"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+xnyBjFr/3Eb5U2K0/Wtkz" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20 Cancel-Lock: sha1:PmbkIdPUSEwKQ8ctZBnfkTq2YxM= In-Reply-To: <101uta3$270$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 250607-0, 6/7/2025), Outbound message On 7/06/2025 12:17 am, The Doctor wrote: > In article , > Theory11 wrote: >> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 16:36:06 +0000, Ubiquitous wrote: >>> In article , blueshirt@indigo.news >>> wrote: >>>> Ubiquitous wrote: >>>>> Hornplayer9599 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hopefully Rose is a placeholder. >>>>> >>>>> From what I heard, it was a stunt to convince Disney to pay >>>>> for another season ("Look at the ratings! People want to see >>>>> another season!"). >>>> >>>> Well... if the alternative is "Doctor Who" being cancelled, I >>>> want to see another season, regardless of the ratings. >>> >>> I'd rather have no Doctor Who than bad Doctor Who. >> >> The simplest alternative is to avoid watching a television program that >> has deteriorated in quality to the stage where it is deemed "bad" by >> parts of its fandom. > > parts? More like a large part. Is "a large part" not "a part"?? -- Daniel70