Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 17:28:31 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 18 Message-ID: <87msdpdb9s.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <87h640gvyr.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 01:28:34 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5cc63718fae4e0a1d8a3e7d5e0bb6717"; logging-data="3041389"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19/0Rf6cjYRZXIHwr+HPNEM" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:FDF9YPQeck+Lt5/GDOSgr65mti4= sha1:HXewwWXDcknJJfUy3rN3Aa76uCU= Keith Thompson writes: > I just saw a post on news.announce.newgroups posted 2025-01-03, subject > "1st RfD: Mass-deletion of moderated groups without a moderator". > > "This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) to remove the following > 101 moderated newsgroups." > > comp.lang.c.moderated is on the list. [...] There's some more discussion of this in news.announce.newgroups, on the thread "3rd RfD: Mass-deletion of moderated groups without a moderator". n.a.n is moderated, so there may be some delay before articles posted there appear. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */