Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Catrike Ryder Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees: Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 14:05:38 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 100 Message-ID: References: <101ut28$2a61j$2@dont-email.me> <101uvnm$2aut6$2@dont-email.me> <101vc40$2dgpg$4@dont-email.me> <9id64khormfkmst7ne5hr8m62v6an39frj@4ax.com> <6i7e4kt2evo5btcj8qckp72jrnqdqrhcjc@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 20:05:40 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="437853e2eda1ff37a2b47cf5c18af6f7"; logging-data="726105"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19zcO0lzKkpOXEYGetuD8RtQ7go+O3EQKw=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:gh9/TW37o3/PL5RdzGDsJSJ/oFs= On Mon, 09 Jun 2025 14:52:11 -0300, Shadow wrote: >On Mon, 09 Jun 2025 08:41:13 -0400, Catrike Ryder > wrote: > >>On Mon, 09 Jun 2025 09:03:38 -0300, Shadow wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 09 Jun 2025 04:05:40 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 21:14:54 -0300, Shadow wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 16:32:54 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 09:48:55 -0300, Shadow wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 14:48:47 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I did >>>>>>>>fly several times during that period and I soon realised that the crew >>>>>>>>didn't make an issue about lowering the mask below my chin. I walked >>>>>>>>around in three airports with the mask hanging around my neck >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I suppose we'll never know how many people you killed... not >>>>>>>that you would lose a minute's sleep if it had been dozens. >>>>>>> []'s >>>>>> >>>>>>Don't be silly... How would I have killed anyone? >>>>> >>>>> To deliberately infect someone with a disease is manslaughter >>>>>here in Brazil, if the victim dies. >>>> >>>> >>>>I had no disease so I couldn't have infected anyone, deliberately, or >>>>otherwise. >>> >>> How do you know? Did you do monthly tests? Note most people >>>were carriers, did not get pneumonia. Only 2% died. >>> Do a blood test today and see if you were a carrier or not. >>>> >>>>FWIW, there were others on the plane and in the terminal with masks >>>>lowered or taken off. >>> >>> And there are people that shoot up schools. I fail to see how >>>that justifies manslaughter. "They killed people so I can too". >> >> >> >>>>On the other hand, I saw morons wearing masks >>>>out on their bikes, with nobody else within two hundred feet. I saw >>>>other fools, all alone in their vehicles wearing masks. Now we're told >>>>that the cloth masks were worthless, as was the need to stay six feet >>>>apart. Some people think their nanny-governments are honest and >>>>wonderful. I don't. I think Fauci ought to be in prison >>> >>> Cloth masks were excellent, if combined with social >>>distancing. New Zealand and Australia are proof of that. The disease >>>only spread when social media belittled the government. >> >>Utter nonsense... The Cochrane Report concluded that there is no >>evidence that the masks did any good. > > > > And he quotes another #FAKE_NEWS. > The study was compromised. They had no idea if the subjects >used masks or not in the study. Your claim to prove.... >>"Seven studies took place in the community, and two studies in >>healthcare workers. Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may >>make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like >>illness (9 studies; 3507 people); and probably makes no difference in >>how many people have flu confirmed by a laboratory test (6 studies; >>3005 people)." >>https://www.cochrane.org/news/featured-review-physical-interventions-interrupt-or-reduce-spread-respiratory-viruses >> >>>>> Probably not so in the US, or most repuglicans would be in >>>>>jail. >>>>> []'s >>>> >>>>I see you've joined the "make up a nasty pseudo-name for your >>>>opponents" club. Don't you think that's kind of juvenile? I do. >>> >>> What they do is "Ugly". It's an accurate description. >>> []'s >> >>Youre momma wears combat boots. > > Only military-dictatorship lovers do that. My mother always >stated that the military should never be deployed INSIDE a country. >That's what the police are for. > []'s -- C'est bon Soloman