Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Borax Man Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: MDI vs SDI. Which is Better? Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 11:38:30 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 13:38:30 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="18031551660d888114fcad7181f7ea74"; logging-data="2240635"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+VoDeL4joPFNHfb9rsV3T366d0I5VCjck=" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:DwQO244fQZ/c0AEzaWrBTZzYSts= On 2025-07-11, Farley Flud wrote: > The unparalleled GNU/Linux software which I utilize, including > global industrial standards like Matlab and Mathematica, all have > a SDI interface with completely independent windows. > > If you don't know what MDI/SDI is just read about it here, dumbfuck: > > > > Most Micro$lop Winblows junk does use the MDI and a lot of the > junk GNU/Linux DEs like GNOME and KDE have software based on > MDI. > > Which do you prefer? MDI or SDI? > > It's not that that I give a flying fuck because I already know > that you are beaten distro lackey that could not exercise choice > if your life depended upon it, but I just want to get some idea > as to how how far the mainstream distro infection has penetrated. > > I thank you in advance (for nothing). > Depends on the context. I'm glad they got rid of it in Microsoft office. Best is being able to chose whether a new document is its own windows or not, such as being able to tear off a tab, or with Emacs, open a new window. I don't have a preference, only that I think SDI works most of the time, and MDI is better in some situations where the documents are tightly coupled.