Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Melissa Hollingsworth Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: Favourite and Least Favourite Doctors, Companions, Anything! Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 10:05:20 -0700 Organization: n/a Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <104c93d$1nvq5$1@dont-email.me> <1059aqc$1r7o$3@gallifrey.nk.ca> <105dbeq$21g66$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 19:05:20 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="eff84aeb5f93ab5bcb193829c8bd3e38"; logging-data="1594180"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX187yxddQqHy7Dfnew08nMeMymSFJeP/17I=" User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4 Cancel-Lock: sha1:mgHmfpn+KxE4wlMmn8HjpnI2CN8= Verily, in article <105dbeq$21g66$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @eternal-september.org deliver unto us this message: > > On 18/07/2025 2:53 am, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote: > > > > I blame RTD for the sex-soaked crap. As I've mentioned before, I suspect > > he wanted to do a Rule 34 Doctor the first time, but the BBC restrained > > him and so he created Captain Jack to bang his way across time and > > space. > > > > Apparently the BBC got desperate and decided to let him do it. Why oh > > why does no one at the BBC actually *like* this iconic show? > > > Sorry. "Rule 34 Doctor"?? I'm not sure if you're asking about Rule 34 ("If it exists, there is porn of it") or questioning my characterization of the current Doctor as an overly sexed-up version. If you still like the show, that's fine with me. I'm not trying to prevent anyone else from watching it. -- Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time This week: The War Games (pts 6-10) https://discord.gg/Fd6Znkme?event=1393948552253935706