Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: New critic Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 21:30:42 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="247551"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$q1NrYoXiD0vm76GPYKoX7e95TX5gmgMBmqBWsEVFHRct1uYfFqxV. X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180 On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 20:37:39 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > "Einstein’s theory of spacetime is wrong" > Yin Zhu > Agriculture Department of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China > > He makes a number of good points in this article and has many articles > on Researchgate. > > For example, there are no stationary muons and since there are more in > the atmosphere the odds are they will have some longer lived ones. Another example is the fact that the Newtonian effect on atomic clocks in orbit has not been compared with the relativistic effect. He has a whole paper on that.