Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: DB Cates Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: What is legitimate about the ID bait and switch scam at this time? Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 18:54:14 -0500 Organization: University of Ediacara Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <102sv76$umd4$1@solani.org> References: <102kqi6$edbo$1@dont-email.me> <102nmm2$16t4n$1@dont-email.me> <102pfdu$1ntga$1@dont-email.me> <20f638a655d24cf60fc28e80b5dd4819@www.novabbs.com> <102q6fc$1tt7l$1@dont-email.me> <102q91g$1u8t3$1@dont-email.me> <102s87g$2h9el$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="17877"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:JtvDVsVMkTRasXfD5hNpOx9X82c= Return-Path: X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id E17BC22978C; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 19:54:22 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9897E229783 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 19:54:20 -0400 (EDT) by pi-dach.dorfdsl.de (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-6~bpo12+1) with ESMTPS id 55HNsI8c797354 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2025 01:54:19 +0200 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pmx.weretis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06F563E87D for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2025 01:54:16 +0200 (CEST) id C69593E850; Wed, 18 Jun 2025 01:54:15 +0200 (CEST) Content-Language: en-CA X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXVqFUzwEH/59gQgvElQfDOZyjX+y0Niwv1+y1ZUqW9zfQUhcSWX0tD/EAE8kQ/Q== In-Reply-To: On 2025-06-17 1:30 p.m., LDagget wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 17:21:50 +0000, RonO wrote: > >> On 6/17/2025 10:07 AM, LDagget wrote: >>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 23:23:28 +0000, RonO wrote: >>> >  snippage > >> What I have always gone by was that when D and L charged tRNAs were in >> the mix, translation still proceeded, but more slowly and L amino acids >> were still used in making the peptide.  I did not recall any type of >> controversy involved, but the paper that I linked to noted that it has >> never been understood why the D amino acids were not incorporated. > > > As with so much biochemistry, it's complicated when you get into the > weeds. Then again, from some perspectives, it's rather simple. > > The perspective I was weened on is one of kinetics. An aminoacyle > tRNA synthetase is an enzyme that, in our modern world, catalyzes > the joining of an L-amino acid of the right sort, to a tRNA of > the right sort. For example, Metionine aminoacyl tRNA synthetase > catalyzes the reaction > > L-Methionine  + tRNA^(Met)(CAU) ==> Met-tRNA^Met(CAU) > > The ^ indicates the (Met) should be Met written as superscript. > (CAU) identifies the anticodon of the tRNA. > > That's a reasonable description which is a good first order > understanding of what happens. Then the fun begins. There is a variant > of the amino acids Leucine and Isoleucine called norleucine. These are > all amino acids whose R group is C4H9 > > So for the generic amino acid H2 - N - CH(R) - COOH we roll through > different substitutions for R. > > Leucine R group is  -CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3. It branches early. > > > Isoleucine R group is  -CH2-C(CH3)2. It branches late. > > Norleucine R groupis -CH2-CH2-CH2-CH3   It does not branch. > > Note: Methionine has the R group CH2-CH2-S-CH3 > > It "looks" just like Norleucine if you swap out the last CH2 for an S. > > And gosh darn, but Met tRNA synthetase also catalyzes the reaction > > L-Norleucine  + tRNA^(Met)(CAU) ==> Nle-tRNA^Met(CAU) > > The damned thing apparently didn't read the textbook or attend > the lectures. Our understanding is that this happens because the > aminoacyl synthetase discriminates according to the shape of the > amino acid but methionine and norleucine have very similar shapes. > > The biotech industry has witnessed significant levels of norleu > incorporation in place of met in fermentation products. It's one of > those things that repeats in cycles because a new generation comes > along who read the textbooks and attended the lectures but didn't listen > to old geezers who work for a living. > > It's always happening at some level. A proper biochemist will think of > it this way. > > The rate at which it happens will depend upon the concentration of L-Met > and L-Nle inside the cell synthesizing the protein. If the cells are > being > fed cheap Purina Cell Chow that has relatively high concentrations of > non > standard amino acids like Norleucine, it will happen more often. The > enzyme > Met aminoacyl transferase may even have a 5 or 10 fold preference for > Met over Nle, but as synthesis progresses, and the concentration of Met > in solution is reduced by incorporation into proteins, the ration of > Nle to Met in the cell will increase. Other metabolic pathways will be > at work to detect and synthesize more of amino acids whose > concentrations > dip, and some salvage pathways will consume other amino acids to make > more Methionine, including consuming Norleucine, but not > instantaneously. > > Not to belabor it (too late, I know) but similar competition exists > with every amino acid tRNA aminoacyl tRNA transferase. > > The textbook reaction will be 100 fold, or 1000 fold faster for the > "right" reaction for equal competing concentration. This will be true > for L vs D forms of the same amino acid, or 'similar' amino acids. The > specifics of the relative preferences vary. > > But here the punchline. It's always a competition. There are always side > reactions. Enzymes don't read textbooks or attend lectures. They don't > know a CORRECT reaction from an INCORRECT reaction. > > It's the same for DNA synthesis and so mutations happen. > > If anyone read this far, you're entitled to tell me to shut up. > Apologies for being so pedantic. > I have been reading this thread with great interest and near zero understanding. But I enjoy that it illustrates an understanding that I was late to appreciate. That biology is *really* messy and the stories we are usually told are greatly simplified and 'prettied up', leaving out the true nature of what is actually happening. So, thank you both. -- -- Don Cates ("he's a cunning rascal" PN)