Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:31:05 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <9oTvw4-YSIPb1dubtdBwcc_MeX8@jntp> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 16 Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:31:04 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1434 X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17e12f0cd31f168c$19636$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> W dniu 11.07.2024 o 16:09, Stefan Ram pisze: > "Paul.B.Andersen" wrote or quoted: >> But what happens when twin B is accelerating makes all the difference. > > From the perspective of the twin chilling back on Earth, the > traveling twin is getting the time dilation treatment the whole time, > so he ages way less. That part's a no-brainer. But now let's flip > the script and look at it /from the traveling twin's point of view/: > Fortunately, we have GPS now, so we can be absolutely sure these absurd tales have nothing in common with real clocks, real observers or real anything.