Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Heathfield Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Halting Problem: What Constitutes Pathological Input Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 09:11:54 +0100 Organization: Fix this later Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <8e653aea60ac1e508df9d8b51baafa5e0f38f6d7@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 10:11:58 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fc99c878bc8892c2ff7fc287d1c7246a"; logging-data="1725290"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/4fD0t1RKLGmDcO6W5/jf3jSQYxUhZUHXhbGziEBo85Q==" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:vBMSVkdgb1kW+d55B6HeugyBfwk= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: On 08/05/2025 09:06, Fred. Zwarts wrote: > Is it over your head that introducing or removing the code to > abort makes the program fundamentally different? Nonsense! I introduced a slight change (just a line or two) to HHH, and it now plays an excellent game of Quake. Modulo the system() call, it's still basically the same program. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within