Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Janis Papanagnou Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { }) Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 22:28:25 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 33 Message-ID: <1000a1a$21ff7$1@dont-email.me> References: <20250415153419.00004cf7@yahoo.com> <86h62078i8.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250504180833.00000906@yahoo.com> <86plggzilx.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86ldr4yx0x.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87wmam4xa5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <868qn2zl1m.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87jz6m4m2o.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86selaxprh.fsf@linuxsc.com> <874ixq41xs.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86frh9ykrv.fsf@linuxsc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 22:28:27 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8a7f9759413c4980109b7dbb13e910aa"; logging-data="2145767"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/kPJ8H2A8X/Up3Nm2M7EKP" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:v5G36/tsAcoxujAs3XJ0J+0b5n8= X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 In-Reply-To: On 12.05.2025 16:34, Richard Heathfield wrote: > On 12/05/2025 15:19, Tim Rentsch wrote: >> [...] > > [...] > > I hope I'm wrong, but it strikes me that you're trying to pick a fight > with Keith. No doubt you have your reasons, but I would have expected > better from a man of your calibre. > > Hey! You do you. What would I know? And it really is none of my > business, which is precisely why, back in the day, grown-ups who wanted > to lock horns would take it to email. It's a social and psychological theme; when a topic gets in a personal direction and getting disrespectful and that is publicly exchanged the response (defense or counterstrike) is likely also continued where the "attack" had taken place. That bickering doesn't go ad infinitum but it at least leads to long and deep threads (with little value). If the disputants have a strong backbone - any many here have - it's getting difficult. But I sense occasional attempts to soothe the situations and thus interrupt the [perceived] endless process. f() { g(); } g() { f(); } without an appropriate 'if' will not be good. An alternative is to not start that process by f() or g() in the first place. - Just an attempt to have this meta-topic getting a bit "C"-like. Feel free to ignore it. :-p Janis