Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: will.dockery@gmail.com (W.Dockery) Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems Subject: Re: NastyGoon lifts a line Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 06:10:17 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <5e9fa5507e967bcf74350c582d436bf1@www.novabbs.com> References: <7cfc525487078b7605a53db0a0d0899f@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3225088"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="Vf9CM7g99yqfGvzEHTw0bhrjcIfvzYBBhUuRma0rLuQ"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: acd0b3e3614eaa6f47211734e4cbca3bfd42bebc X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$DzZgxEpPUNQGI5wcvmJvCedI1gOZYwZUkmfcgVALLOjRSJgK8zipW On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 1:30:57 +0000, HarryLime wrote: > On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 0:04:15 +0000, George J. Dance wrote: > >> https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article.php?id=255731&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments >> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 16:15:27 +0000, Michael Monkey Peabrain (MPP) aka >> "HarryLime" wrote: >> >>> I realized from the content of NancyGene's posts that they were >>> intelligent, well-educated, and better written than anyone here. >>> Naturally, I asked them to start contributing to the "Sampler." And I >>> was right in doing so. >>> >>> Here are the opening lines of NancyGene's latest poem: >>> >>> "Yesterdays stack up like piles of read newspapers, >>> Cluttering my mind and obstructing my day." >>> >>> That's poetry of the highest quality. >> >> The opening line is very good. It's almost as good as the opening line >> of Robert Creeleys poem, "The Days Pile Up": >> >> "The days pile up like unread newspapers," >> >> I do hope "Dr." NastyGoon credited Mr. Creeley; otherwise that would be >> something they would call, you know -- "plagiarism". > > Here we have yet another example of George Dance's libelous and > duplicitous nature. > > For starters he claims that NancyGene "lift(ed) the line" from Robert > Creeley's poem. > > This is an obvious lie. > > NancyGene wrote: > > "Yesterdays stack up like piles of read newspapers, > Cluttering my mind and obstructing my day." > > Mr. Creeley wrote: "The days pile up like unread newspapers." > > The only similarity between the two is extremely superficial; i.e., that > both use the image of piled newspapers as a simile. > > However, they are comparing the newspapers to two very different things. > > NancyGene's poem compares them to "Yesterdays" (which, in the context of > her poem, is a metaphor for "Memories"). > > Mr. Creeley's poem compares them to "days" (which, from the one line > that I've read of his poem, appears to be a metaphor for "Time"). > > In short, we have different sets of words being applied to different > subjects. > > Furthermore, NancyGene's simile for Memory compares it to a stack of > "read newspapers; whereas Mr. Creeley's poem compares Time to a pile of > "unread newspapers." > > The significance between "read" and "unread" newspapers is not merely a > matter of semantics. As a simile for Memory, the newspapers have been > read because they represent the daily events that the speaker has > experienced. These experiences are what provide the content of their > memories. > > Whereas in Mr. Creeley's poem, the newspapers are unread (not > experienced by the speaker). Again, I have not read Mr. Creeley's poem > (more on that later), but based on the content of the opening line, it > appears that his poem refers to the passage of time piling up on the > speaker like *wasted days*. IOW, the speaker is a recluse or shut-in of > some sort -- whether through age, infirmity, or depression. > > These are vastly different subjects with only a few superficial > resemblances in their opening lines. That is hardly an act of literary > theft (a.k.a., plagiarism) -- in spite of Mr. Dance's accusation. > > Secondly, Mr. Dance's accusation of literary theft entails that > NancyGene had been familiar with Mr. Creeley's poem. By leveling this > accusation at her, Mr. Dance is implying that NancyGene had knowingly > lifted a line from Mr. Creeley's poem, without crediting the line to > him. I have spoken to NancyGene regarding this, and she has never heard > of his poem. Nor, for that matter, have I. > > So what, exactly is going on here? > > Let's summarize the above: > > George Dance noticed some superficial similarity between the line I'd > quoted from NancyGene's poem and a line in a poem by Mr. Creeley. Even > though the similes are about different topics, and even though the > "newspapers" are "read" in one poem and "unread" in the other (with > different metaphoric meanings implicit in each); and even though Mr. > Dance had no means of knowing whether NancyGene had even heard of Mr. > Creeley's poem, he falsely accused her of literary theft. > > Aside: He through in one of his childish names ("NastyGoon") as well. > > Both NancyGene and I have attempted to track down a copy of Mr. > Creeley's poem online, without success. > > To give you an idea of significance of this, I proceeded to conduct a > similar search using the name of an obscure small press poet + a > line/title from one of his works. My search returned three results. > > Apparently Mr. Creeley's poem is more obscure than that of a poem by a > totally unknown amateur. Nor does this appear to be due to copyright > laws, as I was able to find a pdf file for an entire collection of > poetry by Mr. Creeley -- in which the poem in question had not been > included. > > I'm sure that one could find a superficial match for any given line of > poetry, as there probably billions of poems to choose from. But why > take my word on it. Let's give it a try and see if I'm correct. > > Let's search for the opening line of Mr. Dance's most well known poem: > "This is my father's house, although The man died thirteen years ago." > > The search returned a whopping 10 pages of results. > > There is a well known hymn by Maltbie Davenport Babcock which opens with > "This is my father's world..." ("This is my father's world, I rest me in > the thought of rocks and trees of skies and seas"). Of course, the > father in this verse is the Judeo-Christian God, so while the words are > similar enough the meanings are entirely different. > > Here's another example where the father is the speaker's biological one: > it's the title of a song by Bruce Springsteen. Bruce's relationship > with his father in the song appears to be a loving one (and one can even > draw a parallel between the relationship of Little Bruce and his > biological to one between Grownup Bruce and God). Again, a different > message, but the Title is *exactly* the same. > > Of course I would never so much as intimate that George Dance lifted the > title of his poem from Mr. Springsteen. I would not even imply this > when I think it highly probable that Mr. Dance has some familiarity with > Mr. Springsteen's song. Since most titles are intended to call > attention to a poem's topic, there are many poems and songs that have > the same titles. > > PING! George Dance. If you know of a site where Mr. Creeley's poem > appears, please either post a link to it, or (copyright permissions > allowing) post a copy of the poem itself for comparison. From what I > have seen of it thus far, it appears to have no relation to NancyGene's > poem, apart from their shared use of a pile of newspapers to create > different similes on different topics. > > I've never understood where your animosity toward NancyGene stems from. > You have launched numerous attacks on her over the years, while she has > largely abstained from the majority of your flame wars with other > members. > > I have, however, always suspected that it stems from jealously on your > part, as her posts are better written than yours, and reveal her to be > better educated and more intelligent than yourself (in spite of your > claims of having been a member of MENSA). > > I think that this latest attack was provoked by my having paid a > well-deserved compliment to one of her poems -- as you have always been > jealous of any poet whose work I have praised (Jim Senetto, for > example). > > In conclusion, I would like to stress the fact that NancyGene's poem is > entirely an original work, and that her opening line is one of the best > that I have ever come across. I prefer it to Mr. Creeley's because it > strikes me as being universally applicable, whereas Mr. Creeley's > (assuming I am reading correctly in its out-of-context form) deals with > cases of isolation and clinical depression which fewer individuals have > experienced. > > -- Nobody expected you to admit Nancy Gene is a second hander troll, Pendragon. And so it goes.