From: Farley Flud Subject: Re: Microsoft warns of blue screen crashes caused by April updates Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy References: User-Agent: Pan/0.146 (Hic habitat felicitas; d7a48b4 gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pan.git) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 19 Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.usenetexpress.com!not-for-mail Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:51:05 +0000 Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:51:05 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1401 X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetexpress.com Organization: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com Message-Id: <1837641f2fe84e75$90361$5831$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:35:11 +0000, vallor wrote: > > Seriously though, X11 continues to be viable and works well. So far, > I haven't seen anyone articulate why Wayland would be better. > From what I have read (I don't use that Wayland junk) a major problem is that X does not support multiple monitors with differing resolutions whereas Wayland does. However, in X multiple monitors are handled through an extension called "Xinerama," and I wonder if Xinerama could be fixed to correct the problem. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinerama -- Hail Linux! Hail FOSS! Hail Stallman!