Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 01:00:25 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <1smdnSjX3YoxgWf7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> <1396870532.749421730.052473.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <1976765442.762208809.808387.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <20250225130315.00004e34@gmail.com> <1924764604.762215659.468999.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 02:00:25 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5663112188f1f002c68c712720ef74d4"; logging-data="2955604"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+PSqWsqGbArRWgLvFk8MPl" User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Cancel-Lock: sha1:OLBSiTqVV77QxUMWEomqxmVdChY= On 26 Feb 2025 19:22:19 -0500, Rich Alderson wrote: > Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes: > >> On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:47:15 -0700, Peter Flass wrote: > >>> The idea of defining different-sized bytes is a real plus. > >> What they meant by "bytes" was really just "bitfields". > > Look up the original definition of "byte" in the signal processing > literature, and you'll find that "arbitrary bitfield" is the original > meaning ... Nobody uses it in that sense any more. Just as nobody says “awful” to mean “awesome”.