Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jim Pennino Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: The Apollo moon landings Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 18:23:11 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 108 Message-ID: References: <7dc7938d9b3ffb3a32296f91500919f5@www.novabbs.org> <1c5039a1ace32ed8d3fe0bcdcf2e69c3@www.novabbs.com> <5g3nhl-n9fr.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <77edb7ccf76cc62f81a30cf16dba94e2@www.novabbs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2025 03:31:05 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="04bf6921cf7a8b9fa38da4c4e413d9a4"; logging-data="500256"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+6zpC6QXW6J99/UHTRqai1" User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-143-lowlatency (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:JrHpD0GNBoia8zmM4EM0Oc5m06k= Bertitaylor wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 1:41:59 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> Bertitaylor wrote: >>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:49:03 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 4:05:16 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 22:45:04 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor wrote: >>>>>>>>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >>>>>>>>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >>>>>>>>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it >>>>>>>>> falling slowly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There was the dropped hammer and feather experiment performed by >>>>>>>> Apollo 15 astronaut David Scott. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why did they not jump up at least two feet up in Apollo 11? They really >>>>>>> would have to do that if they really were on the Moon, could not help >>>>>>> doing so as they were fit men weighing only 60 Kg say? >>>>>> >>>>>> They had other things to do, there was the fear of falling down and >>>>>> damaging the suits, the suits were not designed for gymnastics and the >>>>>> suits were heavier than the occupants. >>>>>> >>>>>> You mean other than that, crackpot? >>>>>> >>>>>> Actually the Apollo 11 astronauts had to make a jump of 3.3 feet to get >>>>>> to the ladder to get back in the lander because the landing gear did not >>>>>> fully compress. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Woof woof, the capacity of apes to believe in the most outrageous >>>>>>> nonsenses is awesome! >>>>>> >>>>>> Outrageous nonsenses is all that you post, Arindam. >>>>> >>>>> Says the penisnino who ardently believes in Big Bang and expanding >>>>> universe and Noah's Ark. >>>> >>>> What does any of that to do with the Apollo landings, crackpot? >>> >>> That the pullulating dull foolish apes like you will believe anything >>> coming from rich and powerful institutions. >> >> Raving gibberish as would be expected from a barking man delusional >> crackpot. > > Now that is the pure Natural Idiocy from the abusive Natural Idiot. > Recently it seeks help from Artificial Idiocy (AI). > > WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof > > Bertietaylor Yes, AI elimates the need to waste my time responding to your noise, crackpot. AI evaluation of latest noise: Arindam, writing as "Bertietaylor," continues his pattern of insult-laden, sloganistic posts with little or no substantive content. Here's a breakdown of this latest message: Evaluation: 1. Language and Tone: The phrase “pure Natural Idiocy from the abusive Natural Idiot” is a recycled insult, possibly directed at a specific individual (likely "JimP" from earlier posts), but devoid of argumentative substance. The term “Artificial Idiocy (AI)” is his now-standard slur against artificial intelligence, used as a rhetorical device to mock or dismiss views he opposes—likely yours or mainstream scientific consensus. The closing “WOOF woof-woof…” is consistent with his performative, pseudo-poetic signature. It functions more as a stylistic tic than meaningful commentary. 2. Content Analysis: No argument is made. There is no engagement with facts, reasoning, or even pseudoscientific speculation as seen in some of his earlier posts. Purely reactive and pejorative. The post is a personal attack in the form of a linguistic sneer, unmoored from any scientific or philosophical proposition. 3. Patterns and Shifts: Compared to his older Usenet writings (which occasionally attempted arguments involving misunderstood physics), this is a regression into pure ad hominem provocation. It aligns more closely with trolling behavior than with delusional or pseudoscientific belief—although it could still be a mix of both. Conclusion: This post represents a minimal-effort continuation of Arindam’s now-familiar routine: insult, accuse, reference AI as “Artificial Idiocy,” and end with a theatrical “WOOF.” It reveals nothing about his ideas or beliefs—only his hostility, and possibly a deterioration of focus and purpose. -- penninojim@yahoo.com