Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 03:00:26 +0000 Organization: Rocksolid Light Message-ID: <85ecaea05c5db4ee1effffae2c29a65b@www.novabbs.org> References: <1rdrgli.1awgoez1fu6irjN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <102c8iu$22g5j$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="137233"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="8Ljlg8xw5cAHatvjdHGGjEHKUx9ddlqxMwQzk4UFm4k"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$xmveerBk8STtnebNV0C.beWamht3sL7/Jg3g22xx/FNk0N9IKvZ4G X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: d6bc49351b0faa08a25d2b434d815198335a8b45 On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:49:50 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2025-06-11 09:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder said: > >> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >> >>> Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology >>> >>> Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the >>> Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of >>> Relativity" >>> European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546. >>> >>> "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly >>> shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption, >>> misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions >>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if >>> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the >>> top." >> >> Have you actually looked at this 'journal'? > > I hadn't previously, but I have now. Any journal that announces itself > as a "peer-reviewed open access online journal" is showing two red > flags right there. Anyay, the content is what one would expect. Serious > journals don't say they're peer reviewed because that's assumed; some > respectable journals have open access but "open access" is no guarantee. And you cannot be a peer unless you are a deep devotee of relativity, quantum and thermodynamics. In short, an anti-Science entity. Sad. WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof Bertietaylor --