Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: Martin Harran Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Texas given up on the switch scam? Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 13:34:29 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 73 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: References: <1011rbv$21a5j$1@dont-email.me> <1019jmj$3s0qp$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="87559"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:fP3RGJISKcnA+OWRT0UFz+TDsYA= Return-Path: X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id C593D22978C; Thu, 29 May 2025 08:34:37 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FDEA229783 for ; Thu, 29 May 2025 08:34:35 -0400 (EDT) by pi-dach.dorfdsl.de (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-6~bpo12+1) with ESMTPS id 54TCYWtK1071883 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 29 May 2025 14:34:33 +0200 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79324609FE for ; Thu, 29 May 2025 12:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: name/79324609FE; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com id 371AFDC01CA; Thu, 29 May 2025 14:34:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Injection-Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 14:34:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX19La12Y3Q1+j7ZAyBEUHjE9l92Q3eIitrE= DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 smtp.eternal-september.org On Thu, 29 May 2025 13:24:51 +0100, Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> wrote: >On 28/05/2025 11:17, jillery wrote: >> On Wed, 28 May 2025 09:44:32 +0100, Martin Harran >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 26 May 2025 08:46:37 -0500, RonO >>> wrote: >>> >>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/texas-bill-ten-commandments-public-schools-rcna206851 >>>> >>>> Texas had bent over for the obfuscation and denial creationist switch >>>> scam back in 2010, but had to have the bait and switch run on them again >>>> in 2013 when they tried to use the switch scam to teach ID in their >>>> public schools. >>>> >>>> They are now trying a more direct approach that seems to be as >>>> unconstitutional as Oklahoma's use of the Bible in public schools as a >>>> text book, and last month Arkansas' Trumpy Governor (she claims that >>>> Trump was chosen by Jesus) signed similar 10 commandment legislation >>>> when I was out on the road. >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> America Magazine, published by the Jesuits, had an article yesterday >>> analysing how it is wrong for the Christian Right to be campaigning >>> for posting the Ten Commandments in schools. >>> >>> I give a link to the full article below but here is the TLDR version >>>from their newsletter yesterday: >>> >>> >>> Father Clifford, a Jesuit priest who taught for 55 years at Boston >>> College and is a professor emeritus of Old Testament there, notes a >>> consensus among biblical scholars from the Jewish, Catholic and >>> Protestant traditions that while the Ten Commandments lay the >>> foundation for Jews' and Christians' relationship with God, they are >>> not meant to be a universal covenant that applies to adherents of >>> other religions-or of no religion. Posting the Ten Commandments in the >>> classroom, then, is not just a violation of the First Amendment, but >>> also a contradiction of the Bible itself. >>> >>> >>> What might be a more appropriate text? "Let me offer an alternative >>> for American classrooms: the Golden Rule, treating others as one would >>> want to be treated by them," Father Clifford writes. "A version of the >>> Golden Rule is found in several places in the Bible and in almost >>> every religion in the world." >>> >>> >>> >>> Full article: >>> https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2025/05/27/clifford-ten-commandments-classrooms-250734 >> >> >> "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you". >> >> A better version is: >> >> "Do unto others as others would have you do unto them". >> >> It's a subtle distinction. But based on your posting behavior, the >> subtleties of both versions escape you. >> > >The second version avoids at least some of the failure modes of the >first, but it has its own failure modes. Consider the case where the >other person is a narcissist or a sociopath. First vesrion works better for me in this context. I ignore a person who I would like to ignore me.