Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rich Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: What Window Manager/Desktop Environment do you use, and why? Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 19:57:03 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: <102kk6f$ckqf$4@dont-email.me> References: <9nikhl-qb2.ln1@otis.foo> <102aft1$1icjg$5@dont-email.me> <102d5t2$298jm$2@dont-email.me> <102ecnj$2l3qp$3@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 21:57:04 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ec7d647605621d8fce1dc294cb244d7f"; logging-data="414543"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19qcU1+MCPcCuDB/Uiwm1Oe" User-Agent: tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:jLk8ePaGQQmdzp7dYUgJ8c9HVaY= Borax Man wrote: > Discipline is indeed what is lacking. I'm an advocate of leaving things > that are working alone. Not reinventing the wheel over and over. > Software developers say that if we didn't reinvent the wheel, we'd be > driving chariots with wooden wheels. The thing is, we don't reinvent > the wheel every 5 years! What those 'developers' overlooked is that we didn't 'reinvent the wheel'. A modern wheel is, functionally, largely the same as that chariot wheel a thousand years ago. What got 'invented' were better materials out of which to make said wheel (iron, steel, aluminum, various rubber compounds for tires, etc.) and better ways of attaching the wheel to the axle (bearings, lubricants, etc.) and better ways of suspending the axle to allow greater movement of the axle than the carriage (suspension arms, springs, shock absorobers to quell oscillations in those springs, etc.). But the 'wheel' itself (a round disk attached to an axle so it can rotate) did not get reinvented. Some get so wrapped up in "inventing a new (different) wheel" they completely forget about "inventing an improvement in the existing wheel" is also very much a thing.