Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rich Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Distros specifically designed for children Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 14:59:29 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: <101ke8h$3bsvv$2@dont-email.me> References: <101c4gj$1qmk5$1@news1.tnib.de> <101e44d$1vf44$1@news1.tnib.de> <101e8qb$104ce$3@dont-email.me> <101e9ma$1vrmp$1@news1.tnib.de> <101ejup$126kd$4@dont-email.me> <101emgm$20q0v$1@news1.tnib.de> <683b0c3a$0$24792$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <101ft88$23cru$1@news1.tnib.de> <683c3039$0$28052$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <101hf8h$27ibv$1@news1.tnib.de> <101jdtl$2bvjv$1@news1.tnib.de> <101jvoe$386sv$2@dont-email.me> <101k9h2$2drn7$1@news1.tnib.de> Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 16:59:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3508be3c3891d17ac3b6c556861102da"; logging-data="3535871"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18nUP2mUX8tpG/Qsn8dwUdS" User-Agent: tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:KHhVLJorZwBNOm3hDr4FkXwYY2o= Marc Haber wrote: > Rich wrote: >>Marc Haber wrote: >>> I also like focus-follows-mouse and find myself frequently typing >>> consciously into a window that is not on the top. >> >>I do the same (Fvwm2 is configured to do 'focus follows mouse'. And I >>often am typing into an xterm (urxvt now) somewhere that is not on top. >> >>However, I did see (no idea of where anymore) one reference that the >>idiot savants that have brought us systemd and gnome have decided for >>us that the MS Win stupidity of "keyboard focus must always equal >>window on top" from MSWin is "the one true way" with their wayland >>system. > > I use KDE Plasma on a systemd system with wayland and have numerous > options to configure focus and window layering options without having > to go to third-party tweaks for my window manager. And, as you are using 'focus follows mouse' mode, that would mean that whatver 'reference' I saw was/is either: 1) outdated; or 2) incorrect.