Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 20:42:45 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <c648d9ea81576e505aa0316f87eb94d6@www.novabbs.com>
References: <1rdrgli.1awgoez1fu6irjN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <102c8iu$22g5j$1@dont-email.me> <85ecaea05c5db4ee1effffae2c29a65b@www.novabbs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="242818"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$rPFY9iHqIK/s2BIlEkXajuVAtgaJ/UV0fxlSKa94GxbwmDpoB7XN.
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 3:00:26 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:

> On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:49:50 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
>
>> On 2025-06-11 09:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
>>
>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
>>>>
>>>> Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
>>>> Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
>>>> Relativity"
>>>> European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
>>>>
>>>> "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
>>>> shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
>>>> misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
>>>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
>>>> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
>>>> top."
>>>
>>> Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
>>
>> I hadn't previously, but I have now. Any journal that announces itself
>> as a "peer-reviewed open access online journal" is showing two red
>> flags right there. Anyay, the content is what one would expect. Serious
>> journals don't say they're peer reviewed because that's assumed; some
>> respectable journals have open access but "open access" is no guarantee.
>
> And you cannot be a peer unless you are a deep devotee of relativity,
> quantum and thermodynamics. In short, an anti-Science entity.
>
> Sad.
>
> WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
>
> Bertietaylor
>
> --
Yes, the relativists commenting have no clue about the retarding
political and social influences holding back science such as peer
review.