Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: do { quit; } else { } Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 14:05:51 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 18 Message-ID: <87wmaknrv4.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <8634enhcui.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86ldsdfocs.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250406162607.0000657a@yahoo.com> <867c3xfhkk.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86bjrxy8he.fsf@linuxsc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 23:05:53 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7bebadcbd12bf891ae6434de1ab23fbd"; logging-data="2156222"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Uf9sJcTdm+TOChGTus4jo" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lTgYwFqZf/RzLpfGEbenbkDcKYA= sha1:qrTNODTIFEfTvHoZ8AAFmDq6zTk= Richard Heathfield writes: [...] > It was a while back now, but there was a time when I lobbied in this > group for a slight relaxing of topicality rules - not by breaching > those rules, but by inviting discussion, cavassing opinions, and > collating them into a show of hands. By an overwhelming majority the > group turned me down. I didn't tell them 'to hell with you, I'll > discuss what I damn well want to, and if you don't like it, tough > cheese'; I accepted the group's decision. > > There may well be some subscribers here who remember that discussion > and might be prepared to corroborate the above. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */