Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<VLJQieDhbmN89xRglUl54CccKYA@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <VLJQieDhbmN89xRglUl54CccKYA@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... References: <uqohpe$11fn$1@dont-email.me> <usq0n9$1l201$6@i2pn2.org> <hwTIr1BT5AxLEltn0vhmkOWHTOU@jntp> <ussfie$1oi9h$3@i2pn2.org> <Wl2yo7e8GtB7Dw0cBdcIbLRWjXw@jntp> <usu2b3$1qebb$4@i2pn2.org> <eWWwAb-tQ_SWr_vhD4tfyUd1e6A@jntp> <usvcoe$1scsr$1@i2pn2.org> <P_2GeWzOrYhYAey1ziOmpvYO-DQ@jntp> <usvhs0$1skf0$2@i2pn2.org> Newsgroups: sci.math JNTP-HashClient: aFWQq2LYGj9-pb4jGXTWMosnI4M JNTP-ThreadID: uqohpe$11fn$1@dont-email.me JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=VLJQieDhbmN89xRglUl54CccKYA@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Fri, 15 Mar 24 13:02:57 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/122.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="7bea31878f2b2c7083e141212b02674bf845b71f"; logging-data="2024-03-15T13:02:57Z/8775311"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Bytes: 2699 Lines: 43 Le 14/03/2024 à 20:06, Richard Damon a écrit : > On 3/14/24 11:38 AM, WM wrote: >> Le 14/03/2024 à 18:39, Richard Damon a écrit : >> >>> the O goes to where the X was and the X goes to where the O was. >> >> So it is. Never an O goes out of the matrix. > > So you aren't doing it right. > > Why do you say that the O going to the OTHER set never leaves, It does not leave the matrix. > and the X > that comes from the OTHER set never replaces it? Every replacement fails to remove an O from the matrix. >>> All the O's end up at the end of the Row/Column, where they would belong. >> >> Also "the end", i.e., the places where the O can go, belong to the matrix. > > No, they don't, Where do they go? > the belong to the SET of Natural Numbers or Unit Fractions. Of course, but all elements of these sets belong to the matrix. > > The "Natural Number n" is NOT the Rational Number n/1, but they have the > same vaule. Initially every n/1 is indeXed by n. > > The "Unit Fraction 1/n" is NOT the Rational Number 1/n, You are wrong. But all that does not remove an O from the matrix. Regards, WM