Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<q5h13jpa18432sm26smdflq3e0ok0hbhms@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Evolution of consciousness
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:18:37 +0100
Organization: University of Ediacara
Lines: 34
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <q5h13jpa18432sm26smdflq3e0ok0hbhms@4ax.com>
References: <v0paug$21fia$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="7612"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
To: talk-origins@moderators.individual.net
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MtG1660RbvyLH8tFHY5nhrs94Lg= sha256:Y2pRUfdPZQm/3I6TArve43CTHryL+dR1Nnu0fkO2Mn0=
Return-Path: <mod-submit@uni-berlin.de>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id B50FB22976C; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 06:18:30 -0400 (EDT)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 784AE229758
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 06:18:28 -0400 (EDT)
          by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.97)
          for talk-origins@moderators.individual.net with esmtps (TLS1.3)
          tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
          (envelope-from <mod-submit@uni-berlin.de>)
          id 1s1kZc-000000013PF-13r4; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 12:18:56 +0200
          by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.97)
          for talk-origins@moderators.individual.net with esmtps (TLS1.3)
          tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
          (envelope-from <mod-submit@uni-berlin.de>)
          id 1s1kZM-00000002Sao-0ekG; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 12:18:40 +0200
          by relay1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.97)
          for talk-origins@moderators.individual.net with esmtps (TLS1.3)
          tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
          (envelope-from <mod-submit@uni-berlin.de>)
          id 1s1kZM-00000001vV3-0N28; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 12:18:40 +0200
          for talk-origins@moderators.individual.net with local-bsmtp
          (envelope-from <mod-submit@uni-berlin.de>)
          id 1s1kZK-00000003ofe-3oCc; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 12:18:39 +0200
X-Path: individual.net!not-for-mail
X-Orig-X-Trace: individual.net 7dtyR7X2xzkOQZa6mBpwfgRXTQ0F/sRu5MjFFfkwcu6BdpA78B
X-Originating-IP: 130.133.4.5
X-ZEDAT-Hint: RO
Bytes: 4126

On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:36:45 -0700, Mark Isaak
<specimenNOSPAM@curioustaxon.omy.net> wrote:

>My views on the evolution of consciousness are starting to gel.
>
>1. Rudimentary nervous systems evolve.
>2. Brains evolve, capable of memory and of decisions other than reflex.
>3. Those decisions probably work better if the brain has a model of the 
>world to work with. So such a model evolves.
>4. Some creatures live socially. Their brains need a model of that 
>important aspect of the world: the fellow beings one lives with, 
>including how they think.
>5. So we've now got a model of minds. How about if we apply it to *our 
>own mind*? That might make our thinking about interactions with others' 
>minds more efficient.
>6. Viola! Consciousness!
>
>Does that make sense to people?  Is it time for me to write a book on 
>the subject? (Do you think publishers will want the book to be more than 
>106 words long?)

Michael Tomasello has already done a lot of the work for you and it's
a bit more than 106 words.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Evolution-Agency-Behavioral-Organization-Lizards-ebook/dp/B09N6M6HDY/ref=sr_1_1



>
>There's also the problem of testing it. I'm open to suggestions there, 
>too. Step 4 implies that the model of how we think need not agree with 
>how we think, much as the mental model of our world is flat, not 
>spherical. This has at least some confirmation (e.g., blindness to many 
>biases). More would be better.