Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v2dtk8$3itvc$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Making Lemonade (Floating-point format changes) Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 15:14:31 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: <v2dtk8$3itvc$6@dont-email.me> References: <abe04jhkngt2uun1e7ict8vmf1fq8p7rnm@4ax.com> <memo.20240512203459.16164W@jgd.cix.co.uk> <v1rab7$2vt3u$1@dont-email.me> <20240513151647.0000403f@yahoo.com> <v1tre1$3leqn$1@dont-email.me> <9c79fb24a0cf92c5fac633a409712691@www.novabbs.org> <v1u6oi$3o53t$1@dont-email.me> <bcbda29c4c23543d1ed6de8290d1dc3b@www.novabbs.org> <v1ubel$3p1kt$1@dont-email.me> <01b78f15d6b5f87809163ce539356ef2@www.novabbs.org> <pZJ0O.14089$yT%1.12952@fx33.iad> <4551b3b18017eb57d94876733377f532@www.novabbs.org> <CPv1O.3$B7ge.2@fx34.iad> <06ca70b0f9a7f44c59dd827779ad855e@www.novabbs.org> <JbO1O.4264$ND9f.2639@fx39.iad> <v28ouo$2dptd$1@dont-email.me> <ad22O.8001$1%Qc.4507@fx18.iad> <v2bg2a$318im$1@dont-email.me> <mUc2O.11686$tPfe.3221@fx17.iad> <v2ds3r$3itvc$1@dont-email.me> <v2dsgr$3itvc$2@dont-email.me> <v2dt0m$3itvc$3@dont-email.me> <v2dt9m$3itvc$4@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 00:14:32 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c64270d287de33e0b6496e257486af9b"; logging-data="3766252"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18gfiIIRaYk/lU2thLFMqJxsQJdpGCQabA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:rfRzfclHLhoSmdIBKo6Aha4C3ao= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <v2dt9m$3itvc$4@dont-email.me> Bytes: 3336 On 5/19/2024 3:08 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 5/19/2024 3:04 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 5/19/2024 2:55 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> [...] >>> I remember a little test that Microsoft made wrt 50,000 concurrent >>> OVERLAPPED ops in IOCP vs an event driven model actually creating a >>> windows event per connection multiplexing WFMO in several threads. >>> The event model did not perform as well, but it did not do too bad >>> either. I wonder if I can still find that paper. Back in 2002 or >>> something. Hard to remember right now. >> >> I am having trouble finding it. I do remember: >> >> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/it-pro/windows-2000-server/cc959494(v=technet.10)?redirectedfrom=MSDN >> > > I just found an old post from me back in 2003 with a link to the paper: > ___________________ > You can get 50,000+ concurrent connections using IOCP, check out the > following link: > > http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/5726a.asp?#128 > > You do have to do some memory management to get there, like posting zero > byte receives to ensure that pending recvs don't lock their buffers, you > can > also restrict the amount of pending sends the server has all together > [...] > ___________________ The way back machine found it, I think! https://web.archive.org/web/20030216222720/https://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/5726a.asp#128 Nice!