Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v6aofa$3n2bs$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Liar detector: Fred, Richard, Joes and Alan
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 09:33:14 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <v6aofa$3n2bs$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v644pn$29t4h$3@dont-email.me> <v645v1$29pag$3@dont-email.me> <v646v5$2agfo$1@dont-email.me> <f01c00463608385b18dba3b5a945f5007e9b3c9e@i2pn2.org> <v68odk$39dkv$6@dont-email.me> <5c7fd202521f077fd21460b0d7f6a435f9396a62@i2pn2.org> <v68pq1$39dkv$9@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2024 08:33:15 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c99e5e36c31ab706f5e25e20d2bee26b";
	logging-data="3901820"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/S/r3LgEQDCZrPkEMl7MEc"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DZegHWnD0ehDq8xJPq4RBFFv4vM=
Bytes: 2541

On 2024-07-05 12:43:45 +0000, olcott said:

> On 7/5/2024 7:26 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Fri, 05 Jul 2024 07:20:04 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 7/5/2024 4:49 AM, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Wed, 03 Jul 2024 13:57:40 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>> On 7/3/2024 1:40 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>> Op 03.jul.2024 om 20:20 schreef olcott:
>>>> 
>>>>>>> DDD correctly emulated by any element of the infinite set of every
>>>>>>> pure function HHH cannot possibly reach its own ret instruction and
>>>>>>> halt. That HHH aborts its emulation at some point or never aborts
>>>>>>> its emulation cannot possibly change this.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ad hominem attacks always try to hide a lack of argumentation.
>>>>>> It has been proved that HHH cannot possibly correctly simulate
>>>>>> itself.
>>>>> 
>>>>> That is false and you know it. That might not be a flat out lie as it
>>>>> is an sloppy use of language.
>>>>> 
>>>>> HHH does correctly simulate itself simulating DDD one time, then it
>>>>> stops correctly simulating itself because this criteria is met:
>>>>> HHH correctly simulates its input DDD until HHH correctly
>>>>> determines that its simulated DDD would never stop running
>>>>> unless aborted
>>>> But it would stop running.
>>> Not if not aborted.
>> But it is aborted!
>> 
> 
> *It is not aborted when HHH makes its decision to abort*

If it will be aborted in future it will not run forever.

-- 
Mikko