Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Approximately 300,000 km/s With Respect To What?
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 16:08:25 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <v7ggcp$3hi7e$3@dont-email.me>
References: <v6pdg9$2k01g$1@dont-email.me> <lfer0bF3dlmU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v708nu$3mln$1@dont-email.me> <lfjtovFqneaU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v72oo9$ko8j$1@dont-email.me> <lfmlkfF7umpU10@mid.individual.net>
 <v786b8$1psia$1@dont-email.me> <lfrqhlF22urU3@mid.individual.net>
 <E89td6du78wfm2OXKZAD6KQeYyY@jntp> <lfut2kFfohpU9@mid.individual.net>
 <rp2ObOnNm5Uis6lq153gZKZa-KM@jntp> <lg13i1Fq3poU8@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 16:08:26 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="05457785d4e8ee4561f1afbdc81e5bb2";
	logging-data="3721454"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19HkFRjBTqJkc12EQuhoDzv"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bN9bSLXqKQpmVvJjArs1s2k5ouU=
In-Reply-To: <lg13i1Fq3poU8@mid.individual.net>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3455

Le 20/07/2024 à 08:25, Thomas Heger a écrit :
> Am Freitag000019, 19.07.2024 um 14:39 schrieb Richard Hachel:
>> Le 19/07/2024 à 12:22, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>>> student.
>>>
>>> We have several other contributers like Poincare, Lorentz and 
>>> cerainly a lot of others.
>>>
>>> But we have Einstein's paper and Einstein himself.
>>>
>>> He got almost deified, even if his paper is full of errors.
>>>
>>> To me this seems to be intentional and to the disadvantage of mankind.
>>
>> Yes, this seems to be intentional.
>> Il fallait déifier Einstein pour enfoncer Poincaré.
> 
> What if this WAS actually intentional?
> 
> Who were the people behind this??
> 
> It must be an immense system, with tremendous wealth and power.
> 
> This is so because to make Einstein that popular would require a lot of 
> power and control of several different media.
> 
> The number of errors in einstein's paper is also extremely large, hence 
> that 'system' would need permanent control over large parts of science.
> 
> Also a mechanism for sanctions against dissidents would be useful.
> 
> But for what reasons would any system take such an amount of efforts???
> 
> Certainly something not very beneficial, because otherwise we would be 
> told about it.

Even as fond you are to pathetically stupid "theories" (growing Earth,
Hitler is a British spy, etc.) you seem to realize, somewhat, how
stupid your claims are?

There is a far simpler way to explain everything
- There are no significant mistakes in Einstein's article
- What Einstein presented there and "modern" SRT are exactly
   the same theory. What has been done since 1905 is geometrizing
   the theory. This leaded the path to GR
- You are not at all competent to evaluate 1905 article : 100%
   of your comments are asinine
- There are no "dissidents". Most physicists understand very well
   the theory and a lot of tried to supersede it with new concepts,
   they are not "silenced" they are encouraged to do so