Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v98e8s$sddi$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 14:15:40 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 41 Message-ID: <v98e8s$sddi$2@dont-email.me> References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me> <v8v7p3$29r2r$1@dont-email.me> <v8vub1$32fso$14@dont-email.me> <1e1fa9bc4bbc00aa65c1a7974bd1bda87687c92b@i2pn2.org> <v90di8$38oni$1@dont-email.me> <47a76378d634bf0db4017f879d0160793b57125e@i2pn2.org> <v9161o$3gaju$1@dont-email.me> <b84374e766c199e1ba38ef1dc3bc8f6ab2c39dfc@i2pn2.org> <v91i97$3n4m0$1@dont-email.me> <v91unh$3rbor$1@dont-email.me> <v92gja$p1$3@dont-email.me> <v94m0l$ljf4$1@dont-email.me> <v95ae9$p5rb$1@dont-email.me> <v978dv$h1ib$1@dont-email.me> <v97j0q$ilah$2@dont-email.me> <ccc5dafb53acf66239baac0183a6291687794963@i2pn2.org> <v97l3j$kof0$2@dont-email.me> <v97pgq$l4f4$2@dont-email.me> <v97qf0$lise$2@dont-email.me> <v97rq3$l4f4$4@dont-email.me> <v97t7g$m8l6$1@dont-email.me> <332fdac834dd53dbe6a8650e170f08fac33ca2cf@i2pn2.org> <v988fu$r9k6$1@dont-email.me> <614b136972063ab2c9d5e3d91e4289858ef24f55@i2pn2.org> <v98ag9$rj63$1@dont-email.me> <9721b1bcc4a6849dabc5d7956754292823381840@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 21:15:41 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ec0d1ee71ceed677a7540299f25b1a73"; logging-data="931250"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ABEhgLdV7K5pVmi6bvrcJ" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:+NW8UsxMePkvwO3f4w8kKMK8H8Q= In-Reply-To: <9721b1bcc4a6849dabc5d7956754292823381840@i2pn2.org> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3384 On 8/10/2024 1:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 8/10/24 2:11 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 8/10/2024 12:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 8/10/24 1:37 PM, olcott wrote: >>>> >>>> void DDD() >>>> { >>>> HHH(DDD); >>>> return; >>>> } >>>> >>>> *The set of HHH x86 emulators are defined such that* >>>> Each element of this set corresponds to one element of the set >>>> of positive integers indicating the number of x86 instructions >>>> of DDD that it emulates. >>> *This is the mistake that I corrected* >>> But every one that emulates for a finite number of steps, and then >>> returns create a halting DDD, so you claim is just disproven. <snip> >> >> When each element of the outer-most directly executed SHH >> corresponds to one element of the set of positive integers >> indicating the number of x86 instructions of DDD that it >> emulates none of the emulated instances of HHH ever returns. > > And EVERY ONE Of them doesn't get the right answer. > *Yes it does seem to be your ADD* We are not even talking about the right answer. We are talking about your mistake that at least one element of the emulated HHH returns. *None of them ever returns no-matter-what* -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer