Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<0vhu0j1tbtntmuiijjho2ge0igj8k40kck@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Some of the stupid people you can have in govt.
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 20:43:42 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <0vhu0j1tbtntmuiijjho2ge0igj8k40kck@4ax.com>
References: <tioi6p$10o$1@gioia.aioe.org> <uujts7$q70$2@dont-email.me> <4bgu0jdjd3bv5rsisf4ku5gano2vdb1ift@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:43:44 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="119cbd5afeea25dc3a76f52a03eb62b7";
	logging-data="1031942"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/5Xb3ucyNQ0I8dOyP7oLt5FuswIJ/tSV8="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bDpojsXGwQCRuvnibK2losDmynM=
Bytes: 3057

On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 17:12:36 -0700, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca>
wrote:

>On Wed, 03 Apr 2024 11:50:31 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
>wrote:
>
>>“After realizing the lack of LGBTQ+ visibility in marine science led her to 
>>abandon her childhood dream, Nicole Morris decided to re-route her life path 
>>to try and become a marine biologist, to conserve endangered rays,” a 
>>description of the film, posted to the National Park Service website reads.
>>
>>“All I was ever exposed to were documentaries that had the perspectives of 
>>straight men,” Morris bemoans in the documentary. “As I got older it became 
>>harder and harder to imagine myself in those films,” she says before later 
>>adding, “So I had to ask myself ‘was marine science something that a queer 
>>woman could do?’”
>
>Which to me is ridiculous.

Yeah, I never understood why people feel the need to have someone to
look up to in that field that they want to enter. I never considered a
career because of who was in it. Only if I was interested in doing
that for a lifetime and could I earn a living. I didn't know anyone in
my first choice of a field (Chemical Engineering) and still can't name
anyone in it. 

Now the career I did choose had a fair number of women in it (at least
at the schools I went to) from the beginning. So clearly women didn't
feel that they had to know some female computer science person before
entering the field.

>Scientifically the value of her work is how it's evaluated by her
>profefssional peers, not her gender identity.

That's true, but I will acknowledge that depending on where you are
you can run into sexism that could work against her. Not everywhere,
by any means, but the stories are out there.
>
>While I appreciate the sciences used to be an all-male domain that was
>then this is now and hasn't been the case for a very long time.
>
>So my response to the question in the last line of your quote is "of
>course you can - go for it!"