Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 12:51:28 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New Level
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <utbtok$pkre$10@dont-email.me> <p6mcnRxmu82A02f4nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <utdl0p$19mot$1@dont-email.me> <6NydnWwGgNc0xWf4nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <utfn65$1nrjb$1@dont-email.me> <J_SdnRPRtZzf6mb4nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <17bea7625eadf0f8$300665$2218499$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> <uthi9p$29328$6@dont-email.me>
From: moviePig <never@nothere.com>
In-Reply-To: <uthi9p$29328$6@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 48
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.hasname.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:51:30 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2653
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3069

On 3/21/2024 11:04 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 3/20/24 10:42 PM, moviePig wrote:
>> On 3/20/2024 7:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> On Mar 20, 2024 at 3:15:33 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" 
>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>> Mar 19, 2024 at 8:26:17 PM PDT, super70s 
>>>>> <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-03-20 02:46:53 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>>>>>>> What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still 
>>>>>>> unauthorized?
>>>>
>>>>>> Lie: The rioters were invited into the Capitol by police
>>>>
>>>>> There is clear video of the police holding the door open for people 
>>>>> who were
>>>>> later found guilty of unauthorized entry.
>>>>
>>>>> How does that logically hold up?
>>>>
>>>> With that evidence, why wasn't the charge of unauthorized entry
>>>> withdrawn or dismissed? Seems to me that both the prosecution and judge
>>>> were obligated to do so.
>>>
>>> One would think. Obviously this only applies to a very small number 
>>> of people
>>> who were there that day but for those to whom it did apply, it seems 
>>> that as a
>>> matter of law one cannot be guilty of unauthorized entry if the 
>>> people in
>>> charge of authorizing you let you in.
>>
>> Indeed.  Not if one remains in the area he was let into.
> 
> 
> Jesus, pig... you don't believe that shit do you?  Judges and juries 
> sure didn't.
> 
> https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/04/politics/fact-check-capitol-insurrection-january-6-lies/index.html

I believe pretty much that whole article, including the admission that a 
couple of police might've allowed a couple of rioters in.  But what I 
was addressing is the fact that allowing them into the building doesn't 
equate to allowing them into Pelosi's office to shit on her desk.