Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 03:39:57 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-C514B8.15165012052024@news.giganews.com> <v1rhbi$31ea6$1@dont-email.me> <pAadnbLSD9TW19z7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-F73D18.19593612052024@news.giganews.com> <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-FDC779.10472413052024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <atropos-FDC779.10472413052024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 59
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 08:39:58 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3426
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17cf4e3af79e0543$22471$310004$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3805

On 5/13/24 12:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me>,
>   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>     In article <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>       moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>     On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands of
>>>>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and that
>>>>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take the
>>>>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she
>>>>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra that
>>>>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?...
>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think the
>>>>>>> government should have told them it was safe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have said.
>>>>>
>>>>> How about the truth?
>>>>
>>>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure*
>>>> carries some risk.
>>>
>>> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of that
>>> risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population.
>>>
>>> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and effective".
>>> (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who suggested
>>> otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.)
>>
>> People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told.  And
>> people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* told.
> 
> So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own
> good.


Yes, they probably even know who was behind JFK being shot even.


>> So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context,
>> the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship to
>> strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation.