Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17d53aea33ae87ec$9480$2724781$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 10:53:30 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <bV-dnTuJNehKEMr7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <17d4370a814a9fe0$40$3919488$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com> <v3a3u3$1o1jk$2@dont-email.me> <17d484d04f3ee493$668$273357$d54a64@news.newsdemon.com> <v3c94e$26huh$2@dont-email.me> <_aB6O.6227$xPJ1.5613@fx09.iad> <v3fi3f$2s159$1@dont-email.me> <17d4f219526ef751$751$273357$d54a64@news.newsdemon.com> <v3hrrg$3c55u$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <v3hrrg$3c55u$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 78
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2024 15:53:30 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3975
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17d53aea33ae87ec$9480$2724781$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4355

On 6/2/24 8:25 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 6/1/24 1:39 PM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 6/1/24 11:26 AM, moviePig wrote:
>>> On 6/1/2024 4:43 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>>> On 5/31/24 5:34 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>>> On 5/31/24 4:16 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/30/24 9:53 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/30/24 4:31 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 5/29/24 3:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Kamala Harris claimed that women's basketball wasn't even 
>>>>>>>>> allowed to have
>>>>>>>>> playoff brackets until 2022, when in reality, women's 
>>>>>>>>> basketball has been
>>>>>>>>> using them since 1982, 42 years.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kamala herself tweeted out exchanges with her husband in 2021 
>>>>>>>>> where they
>>>>>>>>> talked about who they were choosing in their brackets.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/yYjH5g9ogXE?t=409
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Between Biden's almost weekly made-up stories about his past 
>>>>>>>>> and Kamala
>>>>>>>>> gaslighting us about women's basketball, what the hell is going 
>>>>>>>>> on in the
>>>>>>>>> White House?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What the hell is going on with Trump's impending conviction?  
>>>>>>>> Oh, and besides Trump who do you think makes the GOP look worse, 
>>>>>>>> Santos or McCarthy?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Harris owned up to the mistake, and explained it... but you won't 
>>>>>>> hear that in Thanny's False Equivalency Gazette.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not a fan of hers but she is upstanding in that way.  The GOP 
>>>>>> isn't upstanding in any way.  My biggest regret is that Trump 
>>>>>> likely won't be sentenced to jail time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't be too sure.  He's shown no remorse, and he did violate gag 
>>>>> orders 10 or 11 times.  Those are big mitigating circumstances.
>>>>>
>>>>> I could see him serving weekends as a punishment.  And even 
>>>>> community service, which would absolutely humiliate him to death.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fact is, he's going to get some form of punishment.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Judge Merchan is very cool.  It's hard to read how he'll react on 
>>>> this one.  Your points are well taken though, he should be sentence 
>>>> accordingly for those reasons.  I'm thinking he'll get sentenced to 
>>>> home confinement with an ankle bracelet.
>>>
>>> The choice of punishment could reasonably consider a convict's 
>>> likelihood to re-offend.  Since Trump's conviction was ultimately 
>>> about election interference, the judge might notice that Trump 
>>> currently stands accused of at least two other instances of exactly 
>>> that.
>>
>>
>> Is that your supposition or have you heard that somewhere else?
>>
> 
> It's all part of the calculation.  Trump is pushing his luck, and if he 
> gets time, it'll all be because he's been asking for it.
> 
> I could see him doing weekends in jail.  That wouldn't hurt his 
> campaigning, and would teach him to shut his yap.


To be fair anybody else in the world who acted as flagrantly as Trump 
would be hung out to dry--why should the fat orange weasel get any 
preferential treatment?