Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 18:53:22 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Space and spacetime
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <v4k05l$3agjr$3@paganini.bofh.team> <8947f1c75ab514fb64386e4f565d0eb1@www.novabbs.com> <17da22baf80d7cc4$38419$437843$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <ea13148eccc2178dd48b8d6a18b74b2d@www.novabbs.com> <17da3a248be65204$38420$437843$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <a5d0f6dada00f540123a2a722395d2dc@www.novabbs.com> <17da75dec0671347$206783$437843$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <665bf2c2f8d8af99ae6b28936ec91eed@www.novabbs.com> <17da7d7a6a39459a$163213$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <972e62f21cba1316f2184b61c6a0c401@www.novabbs.com> <17da9b4080dd35af$266525$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <a4eb8b42ce7499e5ec60bde25e4e865a@www.novabbs.com> <17dab8b50a072746$163214$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <ccf5155edb060554bdacb76d43c78f36@www.novabbs.com> <17dabca9290af769$189571$436234$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <93708b1befdea8fb7c18da1b3d12630d@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <93708b1befdea8fb7c18da1b3d12630d@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 143
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:53:22 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 5291
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17dac4a0a98761ea$266527$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 5698

W dniu 20.06.2024 o 18:01, gharnagel pisze:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 20.06.2024 o 15:45, gharnagel pisze:
>> >
>> > Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Just more repetitions and lies.  That's all Harrie has.
>> > > Posted the proof dosens of times here and will post
>> > > it many times more, be sure, trash.
>> > > Wozzie is delusional, pretending he has posted "proofs" when
> 
>> OK, trash - an observer going with c/2 through
>> Solar system is going to measure the length of
>> a day. What is the prediction of the physics
>> of your idiot guru for the result? No precision
>> better than 1% needed.
> 
> A "day"?  What is a "day"?  

A day is a day, Harrie. You're an incredible
idiot, sure, but you've  heard of days, haven't
you?

The observer is in the solar system
> and his speed is c/2.  With respect to what?

To solar system, Harrie.

>> > > and you can do nothing about it apart of
>> > > barking, lying and slandering.
>> >
>> > Says the repetitious barker, liar and slanderer :-)
>> > > Wozzie agrees that he is a barker, liar and slanderer since he
> 
> 
>> No, I don't.
> 
> You didn't reply, so that implies you agree with what I wrote.

No, Harrie, it doesn't. And I don't agree.


>> > > I'm sure you can prove LT are correct where they
>> > > are correct; evan such an idiot should be able to
>> > > manage such a task.
> 
> I doubt if you could :-)


Prove that something is valid when it is valid?


> 
>> > > Have nothing against Lorentz and his transformations,
>> > > anyway.
>> > > They demonstrate that t' <> t
> 
>> Nope, they need the interpretation of a relativistic
>> idiot for that.
> 
> Nope.  They need someone who is adept at algebra. 



  Does that
> leave you out?
> 
>> > which explodes Wozzie's "proof."
>> > So he has just admitted that he lied.
> 
>> No,I didn't.
> 
> Yeah, you did.  You are either demented or you're a liar.

No, I didn't. You are both dementad and a liar.

> 
>> Even such a piece of lying
>> shit as Harrie is can't lie 100% of time,
>> but it still can lie most of the time.
> 
> Wozzie lies ALL of the time.  And he just did it again.

Oh, did I? You DO lie 100% of time, Harrie?


> Just like he does here by omission:
> 
>> > > I do and it is.
>> > > Only partly.  A whole body of information.
>> > > > Samely as whole science is.
>> > > That's where Wozzie goes off the rails.  He ignores the
>> > most important part.
> 
> So once again Wozzie admits by default that he is off the rails.

Once again Harrie lies.

> 
>> > > And thus, none of your noble specializations could
>> > > mark you as an  invincible expert about it.
>> > > You've just self-appointed yourself for that,
>> > > as expected from a DK idiot.
>> >
>>> Pot, kettle black :-)
> 
>> I'm actually an information engineer, poor
>> trash.
> 
> One who rejects valid information that he is prejudiced against.

One that rejects an obvious lie of a religious
maniac insisting that The Nature itself is
speaking to him and his idiot gurus.

> 
>> That's the specialization of dealing
>> with information and its various constructs.
>> No way I'm an invincible expert, of course...
>> we could discuss, if you weren't such an
>> arrogant not-even-layman idiot.
> 
> Nice example of his prejudice again :-))

Just some sad truth, Harrie.


>> > He says he has no problem with the LT, so does he
>> > accept that c + v = c?
> 
>> Tell me better, poor trash, whether you accept
>> that Lorentz has prepared his transformations for
>> his own  ether theory, not  for The Shit of your
>> idiot guru?
> 
> Ah, Wozzie won't answer the question, deflecting with an

If LT were designed for an ether theory
the "obvious" c+v=c interpretation of The
Shit's worshippers can't be that obvios,
don't you think, Harrie, poor halfbrain?