Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17db99ee0b8ccd68$237$3767249$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 05:02:10 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Criminal Records Expunged for St. Louis Gun Couple
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <B7WcnT_drY_sm-_7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-1CD7DC.18410418062024@news.giganews.com> <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-DE6AC6.09273119062024@news.giganews.com> <v4v8ug$23o16$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-542467.12091619062024@news.giganews.com> <v52l9a$2qv7o$10@dont-email.me> <atropos-597F57.18352820062024@news.giganews.com> <17dafa563c68a967$159724$3694546$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com> <v56qu3$3qg7n$13@dont-email.me> <qpWdnXSHkrbQbuv7nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@giganews.com> <v57evd$3u7ea$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <v57evd$3u7ea$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 77
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 10:02:10 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3926
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17db99ee0b8ccd68$237$3767249$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4417

On 6/22/24 4:16 PM, moviePig wrote:
> On 6/22/2024 11:52 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 6/21/24 5:17 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>>> On 6/20/24 8:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <v52l9a$2qv7o$10@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/19/24 3:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <v4v8ug$23o16$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 6/19/2024 12:27 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>      moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/18/2024 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>       "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ST. LOUIS (AP) - A judge has expunged the misdemeanor 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> convictions
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a St. Louis couple who waved guns at racial injustice
>>>>>>>>>>>>> protesters
>>>>>>>>>>>>> outside their mansion in 2020. Now they want their guns back.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I had no idea that four years later, this still hadn't 
>>>>>>>>>>>> happened.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It was a gated community, which are all over St. Louis. They 
>>>>>>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>>>>>>> trespassing.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently 'trespassing' is a meaningless term when you're doing
>>>>>>>>>>> it for
>>>>>>>>>>> 'social justice'.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Don't you even *pretend* there's a built-in tug-of-war between
>>>>>>>>>> "trespassing" and "peaceable assembly"?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe in a public place like a university quad, but not in a 
>>>>>>>>> private
>>>>>>>>> residential neighborhood.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Under the presumption that each point of view must give some ground
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why would you presume that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'd say that the protesters' rights depend on history, geometry, 
>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd say (and I'd be right) that no protester has rights to come 
>>>>>>> onto my
>>>>>>> private property at all. I'm the only one who gets to decide who's
>>>>>>> allowed and who isn't. It's pretty much in the definition.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> They were in the street, not on McClosky's property.
>>>>>
>>>>> The street was private property, too, smooth brain.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lying sack o' shit alert.  Can you prove to us the McShitbags owned the
>>>> street?  Of course you can't because you're a lying sack o' shit.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Doesn't matter if the fucking King of Prussia owned the street, you
>>> can't menace people with guns.
>  >
>> You can when they're menacing you.
> 
> Afaik, pissing you off isn't "menacing you".


Especially when the horribly menaced people are the ones carrying weapons.