Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 11:05:26 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Energy?
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <Energy-20240728103722@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <66A8307B.8B6@ix.netcom.com> <9U6dneBCi4_A_DX7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <66A9CBC9.2213@ix.netcom.com> <66a9ef78$1$8237$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <17e73ef78c331cc1$123024$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <7c859ee125873c07a6e93c2ff0fa5099@www.novabbs.com> <17e766fee8072224$32990$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <7d6a2d9468448e1cf6ca34ac933b4f40@www.novabbs.com> <66ac9361$1$11712$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <66ac9361$1$11712$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 60
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 09:05:24 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3055
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17e7de0bc2d3d88a$145587$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3462

W dniu 02.08.2024 o 10:05, J. J. Lodder pisze:
> gharnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 20:43:47 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>
>>> W dniu 31.07.2024 o 17:30, gharnagel pisze:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 8:30:15 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> And thus - conservation of energy, your alleged
>>>>> "law of nature" is really a simple language truism
>>>>> (and it's not a critique, just stating the fact).
>>>>
>>>> So Wozzie doesn't believe energy conservation is a
>>>> law?
>>>
>>> Herrie, poor halfbrain, you're free to
>>> believe  The Nature herself speaking to Chosen
>>> Ones and reveal Her Laws for repeating to
>>> little ones; but  only  idiots like you
>>> can believe  such crap.
>>
>> So eighth-brain Wozzie, by his own admission,
>> doesn't believe in conservation of energy.
>> Why would that be?  Perhaps it's because he
>> doesn't believe in anything?
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism
>>
>>> With the definition above - your "law" is
>>> a simple truism, and some  fanatic idiots
>>> screaming "NOOOOOO!!!!" change nothing.
>>
>> Wozzie-idiot, the disinformation engineer,
>> doesn't understand science.  Of COURSE
>> conservation of energy is falsifiable!  It
>> can be determined by making measurements.
>> So far, it hasn't been falsified.  Supposed
>> problems have arisen in the past and were
>> put to rest by finding new forms of energy
>> or new particles.
> 
> So it is not falsifiable by experiments.
> It can only be falsified -by failure-
> to find a new and better theory
> of what energy is. (in which it is again conserved)
> 
> Of course such a situation is impossible,
> for such a failure to find a better thery
> could just be due to our collective stupidity.
> We can never be sure that it cannot exist,

Even a relativistic idiots can (partially) think
sometimes.
That's right. Your alleged "Law of Nature"
allegedly revealed to you by Nature Herself - is
really a simple language truism.
You really have no clue of what science is doing
to  you and what it is using you for.