Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <1e0cdddca00fbd5c020523a0f244d79f@www.novabbs.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<1e0cdddca00fbd5c020523a0f244d79f@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: =?UTF-8?B?dC12eC9jwrI=?=
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 22:16:12 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <1e0cdddca00fbd5c020523a0f244d79f@www.novabbs.com>
References: <8dc9a6eb5ee097da5239175cb7833cd6@www.novabbs.com> <vdokav$6m87$1@dont-email.me> <d885ef8307d7eb48a4157a4e5eb97ab6@www.novabbs.com> <vdpbaq$alks$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="595483"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="OjDMvaaXMeeN/7kNOPQl+dWI+zbnIp3mGAHMVhZ2e/A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 26080b4f8b9f153eb24ebbc1b47c4c36ee247939
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$sv5KCD/s2oQwea.yTZdduOwZg//HL9gE2Cev4tVG1VlAblzploDji
Bytes: 4356
Lines: 110

On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 18:17:06 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

> Den 04.10.2024 15:34, skrev rhertz:

<snip>
--------------------------------------------------------
> A coordinate transform is:
> t' = at + bx
> x' = ct + dx
>
> Do you think that the term "b" has another EXPLANATION,
> EITHER WITH A PHYSICAL MEANING OR EVEN A METAPHYSICAL ONE,
> than the terms a, c and d?
-------------------------------------------------------

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Translation:On_the_Principle_of_Doppler

Here are the linear transforms that Voigt managed:

VOIGT'S LINEAR TRANSFORMS HYPOTHESIS (Equations 2:

x by ξ = xm₁ + yn₁ + zp₁ - αt
y by η = xm₂ + yn₂ + zp₂ - βt
z by ζ = xm₃ + yn₃ + zp₃ - γt
t by τ = t - (ax + by + cz)

ARE YOU SO STUPID THAT CONFOUND INITIAL HYPOTHESIS WITH RESULTS?

This is the original Voigt's LOCAL TIME. Learn it for once, idiot.

τ = t - χ/ω² (x α₁ + y β₁ + z γ₁)  , Equation 13


Voigt used full 3D for waves propagation, hence the components x,y,z.

-------------------------------------------------------------

<snip>

> There is no "local time" in SR.


ARE YOU BECOME, FINALLY, FULL RETARDED?? SHAME ON YOU!

This is the result of Einstein's plagiarism of Voigt and Lorentz, page 7
of the 1921 English translation:

τ = Φ(v)  β (t - vx/c²) ;  Φ(v) = 1 and β is the current γ factor.

AND THAT IS THE INFAMOUS LORENTZ LOCAL TIME!
Really, you are becoming more and more stupid with the years!

------------------------------------------------------------
IT COMES DIRECTLY FROM 1904 LORENTZ PAPER:

H.A. Lorentz, Electromagnetic phenomena in a system moving with any
velocity smaller than that of light

1904 ORIGINAL LORENTZ TRANSFORMS


x' = β x  ;  Lorentz Eq. 4
t' = t/β - β vx/c² ;  Lorentz Eq. 5 (HERE IS LOCAL TIME WITH ETHER)


Making  x = X - vt (Einstein did that, to get rid of ether)

t' = β (t - vX/c²)
x' = β (X - vt)

THE SAME CRAP THAT EINSTEIN USED ONE YEAR LATER.

------------------------------------------------------------
>
> You can see what Lorentz meant by "local time" in chapter 3 here:
>
> https://paulba.no/div/LTorigin.pdf
>
> Quote:
> "Lorentz called the t' coordinate ’local time’, as opposed to
>   the t coordinate which was the ’absolute time’ inherited from Newton.
>   But note that this ’local time’ is what it shown by local clocks,
>   and it is the ’local time’ that can be measured.
>   The ’absolute time’ t is unobservable."
>
> Only an idiot would call a term in a coordinate transform "local time".
> What is the term vt? "Local position"?
>
> And only an idiot would claim that all physicists born after 1900
> are frauds.
>
> Don't you agree, Richard? :-D

-------------------------------------------------------------

Only a blind, deaf and stupid relativist like you deny WRITTEN HISTORY!


Here is what Lorentz wrote about "local time" in his 1904 paper (p.813):

************************************
"The variabie t' may be called the "local time"; indeed, tor k = 1,
1 = 1 it becomes identical with what I have formerly understood by
this name,"

***********************************

DID YOU GET IT, IGNORANT?


GTFO!