Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<20240823112029.00002202@yahoo.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 11:20:29 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <20240823112029.00002202@yahoo.com>
References: <v9t3ih$2e8ee$1@dont-email.me>
	<memo.20240818192128.19028F@jgd.cix.co.uk>
	<61a50eac95ff8fa39af47f03daa885d0@www.novabbs.org>
	<va9ech$r8p6$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 10:20:37 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="390be1a8b7b8306fa0a09c1cb3e4318f";
	logging-data="902674"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/YiRYEwWb3y0rKCOccX+CG6KeYilvT7eg="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3ML9qBOKu9VSoQGZis1vd4ZAKlw=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Bytes: 2050

On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 09:40:00 +0200
Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> wrote:

> MitchAlsup1 wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:21:00 +0000, John Dallman wrote:
> >  =20
> >> =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 I had a basic COBOL course at =
college in 1980-81, and
> >> became quite clear that this wasn't what I wanted to do.
> >>
> >> John =20
> >=20
> > So, John is not a COBOholic !! =20
>=20
> Also not a COBOL fan, mostly due to the verbosity.
>=20
> I once ported a COBOL-specific algorithm to Pascal, which meant that
> I had to reimplement code for all the 80-col punch card formatted IO
> as well as sorting according to quite special rules.
>=20
> The original was 25 pages, my replacement ~5, at least half of which
> was the COBOL specific function replacements, so the mainline code
> became an order of magnitude smaller.
>=20
> Terje
>=20

What would be the size if you were porting it from COBOL to COBOL ?