Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us11.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=`ECXc5:BGQM=LX4bSbU0nMHWonT5<]0TMdjI?Uho:XeKlL51CP6LDLL95GMl]75=8AHmmfl3JE?fO7@<I4Rf8bAAl3[[dIf;_mF2Do^b@=QS7G
X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Is Windows-on-ARM On Its Last Legs?
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:32:01 -0400
Message-ID: <87gp7jd3v634rb4rj8k3mkgit50t0n9u7j@4ax.com>
References: <v5i1f9$2b6kq$1@dont-email.me> <pl2p7jhp2emdsp5up04c7ntbn7s3rf4ft1@4ax.com> <v5i8ut$2cjv1$1@dont-email.me> <89ap7jd58cul732kscvb28kofcl46k1hj7@4ax.com> <v5i9ul$2cjv1$6@dont-email.me> <67bp7jpbbnqf4aqnk60hvkl6uon1gmcug0@4ax.com> <v5ied6$2deru$1@dont-email.me> <1cfp7jpvlt7cclcg7a19dogbji0dsgc3ss@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Lines: 40
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1719451921 reader.netnews.com 2363134 127.0.0.1:37187
Bytes: 2390

Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>>> Why would you expect Intel/AMD CPUs to last much longer?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Certainly the Windows market is unable to move away from them.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why?  They have Winblows on ARM, apps can be compiled for it or
>>>>> emulated.
>>>>
>>>>But Microsoft cannot offer a compelling value proposition for moving to
>>>>such machines.
>>> 
>>> Sure they can, it's efficient ...
>>
>>Only when running ARM-native code. Otherwise the x86 emulator drags 
>>performance down. And that still applies to the vast majority of Windows 
>>apps.
>
>Read the entire post I wrote, dummy.


Actually, it wasn't even due to your unnecessary snipping, it's
earlier in the quoting you left in, "can be compiled for it".  Either
way, comprehend first.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.