Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:07:29 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Meet U.N. "Climate Advisor" Ayisha Siddiqa...
References: <iQmdneoaIp7hh5P7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> <uv3gvc$8i1o$1@dont-email.me> <vhidnQFZ97fC7Yj7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <uv4p4e$ibmh$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS
Message-ID: <FISdnYGvraD8aYj7nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@giganews.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:07:29 +0000
Lines: 129
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-byao0EiQu9ML0MV3bdxIXYzIEWR8o7zSvQQxQ57GnOCDdZ+T1aYyPwREV2BcQiGmfs1jkqvJxEsBnT0!FHpe1KvbjJNN89zFbNQ1U4Z3O0EjAaAK8lFmbKDvuISoV4yP0SrQETL9CEOojt4JHDFt88Z98972
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 7009
X-Original-Lines: 123

On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:13:48 PM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 4/9/24 12:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>  On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:48:25 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  
>>>  On 4/8/24 4:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>    In article <uv0vg6$3hsmc$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>    wrote:
>>>>    
>>>>>    On 4/5/24 3:29 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>    FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>    On 4/4/24 8:50 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>    In article <uuneea$uqll$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>    wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>    On 4/4/24 3:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>    In article <uum8rd$ln18$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>    wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>    On 4/3/24 11:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    Ayisha Siddiqa (@Ayishas12), a climate adviser for the UN.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1775191286032523366?s=20
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    She claims the "white man" and "capitalism" are responsible for
>>>>>>>>>>>>    bringing life to "the verge of extinction" and calls white men
>>>>>>>>>>>>    killers, looters, and abusers. Her account is filled with hateful
>>>>>>>>>>>>    anti-white posts.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    Apparently, it's totally fine to be disgustingly racist against
>>>>>>>>>>>>    white people if you work at the United Nations.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    Why are we funding these racist clowns with our tax dollars? The
>>>>>>>>>>>>    United States should simply withdraw from the U.N., send these
>>>>>>>>>>>>    bigoted assholes back to their shithole countries, and retrofit
>>>>>>>>>>>>    U.N. Plaza to house our homeless veterans.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>    Libs of Tik Tok. That's all I need to say.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>    LOL!
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>    Because posting other people's self-owns somehow invalidates those
>>>>>>>>>>    self-owns.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>    Posting racists and book banners, you mean.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>    Ayisha Siddiqa is a racist, I'll grant you, but what books has she
>>>>>>>>    banned?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    "Raichik has left up scores of tweets denying the existence of systemic
>>>>>>>    racism.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    Cool. Now answer the question I asked.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    The day after Juneteenth 2021, Raichikšs account posted a
>>>>>>>    callout to her followers, asking them to reply with one word and she
>>>>>>>    would try to find a video saying why that word is racist.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    So she finds various videos from leftists claiming almost any word you can
>>>>>>    think of is racist and she's racist for posting them?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    Oooo-kay, Jan.
>>>>> 
>>>>    So now you're a racist if you don't automatically agree with whatever
>>>>    racism claims leftist make? That's in an interesting take. Insane, but
>>>>    interesting.
>>>>    
>>>  Nope. I forgot you can't read. "She's racist because she holds racist
>>>  opinions." is a simple concept to grasp, even for you.
>>  
>>  What opinion of hers is racist?
>>  
>>>>  Slate scrolled through thousands of Raichik's tweets, including hundreds of
>>>>  deleted tweets, to understand how one real estate agent could gain such
>>>>  clout and to try to discern her next targets. One notable trend was clear:
>>>>  Raichik’s feed is colored by an intense hostility to liberals generally, but
>>>>  she holds an especially pronounced animosity toward LGBTQ people, city
>>>>  dwellers, and black people who have been killed at the hands of police.
>>> 
>>>>  The same week that Raichik said she started "the tik tok thing", Minneapolis
>>>>  police officer Derek Chauvin was convicted of murdering George Floyd. Prior
>>>>  to his conviction, Raichik had focused on a different flavor of right-wing
>>>>  content under other usernames. But around the time the verdict came down,
>>>>  Raichik let her apparent views on police violence be known: Floyd was a
>>>>  criminal and his death was the result of drug use, not Chauvin's brutality,
>>>>  she made clear in a series of tweets.
>>  
>>  That's actually true. Saint Floyd's cause of death was a drug overdose.
>>  
>>>>  Raichik’s apparent hostility for black victims of police violence didn't end
>>>>  with Floyd. She also tweeted repeatedly mocking the killing of 16-year-old
>>>>  Ma'Khia Bryant, and in another video, the account endorsed random police
>>>>  brutality.
>>> 
>>>  So you can go right out and fuck right off.  She's a goddamned racist
>>>  because she holds racist opinions.
>>> 
>>>  Just. Like. I. Proved.
>>  
>>  You proved nothing other than Slate has called her a racist. They say they
>>  found racist tweets but then said they were deleted, so we conveniently
>> can't
>>  see all this racism they claim exists.
>>  
>>  And then they, like you, claim that just denying the existence of 'systemic
>>  racism' is itself racist. If that's what Slate (and you) consider racism,
>> then
>>  you're both full of shit.
>>  
>>  Oh, and by the way, just as you constantly dismiss things based on the bias
>> of
>>  the messenger, you're going to have to come up with something better than
>>  Slate if you want to actually prove anything because-- according to Effa's
>> Own
>>  Rules-- Slate is a very biased messenger, which nothing they say is
>>  trustworthy and you've proved nothing.
>>  
>> 
> You can see the old tweets just fine, Dumbo.
> 
>
> https://www.queerty.com/libs-tiktok-deletes-thousands-tweets-owner-exposed-internet-remembers-forever-20220420

Queerty.com... that's all I need to say.

(Hey, this is fun! Just dismiss a source because it's biased and there's no
need to go any further. Thanks for this rule, Effa!)