Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 07:55:05 +0000
Newsgroups: rec.games.frp.dnd
Subject: Re: OneDnD seems to mainstream psionics
From: Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 03:54:47 -0400
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
References: <v0dmh2$1rvpq$1@sibirocobombus.campaignwiki>
 <v0dqv3$323o9$4@dont-email.me> <7ivk2j560cru7gbb1eb1gl0drn76k2pg6b@4ax.com>
 <v0e6v4$1u868$1@sibirocobombus.campaignwiki> <v0eipj$37jkh$2@dont-email.me>
Message-ID: <XamdnY8Tb4bEa9P7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 21
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-5laICUjoUmIFdLXucztJQ3lTwcvLdoHJ9p4WoZVT25wIfkHYtFE8ty3ryVyLHRBi+e+XLKPzjAaBlnP!jbp8trKw9j84wS3CqFtMj0ZvzysLhgKGVe6Rk/GL8/4DoE3JKn/LyJoebIhqNcW5wKFOHWcGWUPJ
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2019

In article <v0eipj$37jkh$2@dont-email.me>, justisaur@yahoo.com wrote:
> On 4/25/2024 10:57 AM, Kyonshi wrote:
>> On 4/25/2024 6:16 PM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

>> Don't forget warlocks, which didn't use to be a thing but now are. On 
>> the other hand it sounds as if those they want to have are just 
>> variations on fighters and thieves instead of proper psions. 
>
>Warlocks and Sorcerers were both added in 3.5e  I liked the iterations 
>in that edition much better.  They both feel like they should be 
>sub-classes and in optional books.  Do you really need 3 charisma based 
>arcane full caster base classes in the PHB?  Heck there's only 2 full 
>physical classes.

I like Warlocks as witches and would play up the being a servant to a 
higher power (not necceassrily a deity) better than previous attempts,
though I liked the one in Dragon Magazine a lot.

--
Let's go Brandon!