Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 23:21:56 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences
References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-C514B8.15165012052024@news.giganews.com> <v1rhbi$31ea6$1@dont-email.me> <pAadnbLSD9TW19z7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-F73D18.19593612052024@news.giganews.com> <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-FDC779.10472413052024@news.giganews.com> <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-859A07.13351913052024@news.giganews.com> <v1u2bf$3n232$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-ACE9E8.15333813052024@news.giganews.com> <v1u6e3$3o2h8$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 16:30:54 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-72BEA9.16305413052024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 93
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-mEsAul/H70dhltGxI2SaobsdpA9Vf11W3yAfui2qPfylYcGr7qMLpTXvAjUN/FqKBJwEIOgAM+ddfgJ!Cr7BFCAO7ETUV68ZLmqQlI6IAklPBN2XbtMmQEmJJ1YIfyxvHjz4uDLvHC+5LrH2kSYsACMHcSBf!84I=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 5459

In article <v1u6e3$3o2h8$1@dont-email.me>,
 moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On 5/13/2024 6:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <v1u2bf$3n232$1@dont-email.me>,
> >   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 5/13/2024 4:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 5/13/2024 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> In article <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>      moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>       In article <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>         moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>       
> >>>>>>>>>>>>       On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>       
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?...
> >>>>>>>>>>>       
> >>>>>>>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think 
> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>> government should have told them it was safe.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have
> >>>>>>>>>> said.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> How about the truth?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure*
> >>>>>>>> carries some risk.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of 
> >>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>> risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and 
> >>>>>>> effective".
> >>>>>>> (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who 
> >>>>>>> suggested
> >>>>>>> otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. And
> >>>>>> people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* 
> >>>>>> told.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own
> >>>>> good.
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>> So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context,
> >>>>>> the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship 
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>> strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation.
> >>>>
> >>>> Once again, real-world decisions appear simplest to those who don't have
> >>>> to make them. But happily, in this instance, the vaccine *was* safe.
> >>>
> >>> Except for the people who were injured by it.
> >>
> >> This just in:  Don't risk getting out of bed tomorrow...
> > 
> > This just in: People have a right to know all the risks of drugs they're
> > not just being asked to take, but ordered to take under threat of loss
> > of their livelihood.
> 
> I'll bet that *all* the risks of *any* vaccine will run to thousands of 
> words 

The government has the bandwidth.