Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 22:24:41 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences
References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-C514B8.15165012052024@news.giganews.com> <v1rhbi$31ea6$1@dont-email.me> <pAadnbLSD9TW19z7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-F73D18.19593612052024@news.giganews.com> <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-FDC779.10472413052024@news.giganews.com> <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-859A07.13351913052024@news.giganews.com> <v1u2bf$3n232$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 15:33:38 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-ACE9E8.15333813052024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 74
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-1Dg0sXAZA8u3OnMMmttmoFC0Asex3Lzvkb6bedjGh9gHqD9wCcS/KjWDEpwJDQiL8CgMjZjYCf4xTbG!8z6lyXywmKU0VADzTwxVebDgYmfzdKSnrduFpiEE8QhgVTsTe37DI03d7QDs3h98T2K8yX+KLxlg!MVc=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4809

In article <v1u2bf$3n232$1@dont-email.me>,
 moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On 5/13/2024 4:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me>,
> >   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 5/13/2024 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> In article <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>      In article <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>        moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>      
> >>>>>>>>>>      On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>      
> >>>>>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands of
> >>>>>>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and that
> >>>>>>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take the
> >>>>>>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she
> >>>>>>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra that
> >>>>>>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?...
> >>>>>>>>>      
> >>>>>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think the
> >>>>>>>>> government should have told them it was safe.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have
> >>>>>>>> said.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> How about the truth?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure*
> >>>>>> carries some risk.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of that
> >>>>> risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and effective".
> >>>>> (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who suggested
> >>>>> otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.)
> >>>>
> >>>> People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. And
> >>>> people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* told.
> >>>
> >>> So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own
> >>> good.
> >>>    
> >>>> So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context,
> >>>> the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship to
> >>>> strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation.
> >>
> >> Once again, real-world decisions appear simplest to those who don't have
> >> to make them. But happily, in this instance, the vaccine *was* safe.
> > 
> > Except for the people who were injured by it.
> 
> This just in:  Don't risk getting out of bed tomorrow...

This just in: People have a right to know all the risks of drugs they're 
not just being asked to take, but ordered to take under threat of loss 
of their livelihood.