Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us11.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=RE9g`f@M_\X44H7ZL^CcbUHWonT5<]0T]djI?Uho:Xe[lL51CP6LDL\95GMl]75=8Q;^@RAU\IDKY7@<I4Rf8bAQl3[[dIf;_mV2Do^b@=QS7W
X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: "The first Copilot+ PC has been tested ? and it destroys the MacBook" (was: "The first Copilot+ PC has been tested — and it destroys the MacBook")
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 12:17:14 -0400
Message-ID: <haf15jt4hdtubu7rr54ig0pd3s84bh7qdu@4ax.com>
References: <a6rv4jps6ntipe5ftkv5cclic24f9gq2qr@4ax.com> <XeWdnWM7WqlIEs37nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@supernews.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Lines: 41
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1716567434 reader.netnews.com 2363133 127.0.0.1:53255
Bytes: 2461

Tyrone <none@none.none> wrote:

>> https://www.yahoo.com/tech/first-copilot-pc-tested-destroys-135658453.html
>
>Oh look.  Yet ANOTHER invalid comparison. 
>
>The MacBook Air they used for this very contrived test has an 8 core M3. The
>actual low-end version.  Of COURSE the Qualcomm X elite is faster, it has a 12
>core CPU.
>
>Why don't they test against a 12 core M3 MacBook Pro? Or a 14 core model? Or a
>16 core model? 
>
>Not to mention that the M3 is last year's chip from Apple. The M4 Macbooks
>will be available soon. 
>
>Apple has nothing to worry about, and Microsoft just appears to be very
>desperate by publishing these meaningless stories. "The report was compiled by
>Ryan Shrout, an ex-Intel employee who’s now a part of Signal65, and it was
>commissioned by Microsoft."


I will concede you likely know this better than I would have,
nevertheless, it shows where this is heading.  M$ is nothing if not
open to change.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.