Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <pV6diSgMn424_BVfaTlYcGfQbuQ@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Getting there at last...
References: <1HWE6H1jV8YTvxfaaL7fnCCcpe8@jntp> <9YCpfbWayDDTVrmI9Yye1LKiThs@jntp> <l6kfsfFjqknU2@mid.individual.net>
 <WuhuOl-fQu3J7ho5vcxwxFwmlEQ@jntp> <l6puenFeh5pU1@mid.individual.net> <bigu1zNUD9n8JIWm2zHpTNzxgBQ@jntp>
 <l71kmnFje11U1@mid.individual.net> <AwNHa33OTto93tgHGw_X4ucJZ-Y@jntp> <660C3EF7.3876@ix.netcom.com>
 <uuhitu$3c4p4$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: lPnECOKwVaRDLhuOXlY0Cv9fb54
JNTP-ThreadID: 5ipMllmo3ZDdVjvYIsvl1ofrDVs
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=pV6diSgMn424_BVfaTlYcGfQbuQ@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 24 00:16:02 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/121.0.0.0
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="601f4a4a60dc6043f0c3ab83656fd85fb6bc327d"; logging-data="2024-04-03T00:16:02Z/8803343"; posting-account="219@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Bytes: 16035
Lines: 371

Le 03/04/2024 à 03:31, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :
> On 4/2/2024 10:23 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 02/04/2024 à 16:51, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>>> Am 30.03.2024 um 11:38 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
>>>>> Le 30/03/2024 à 18:48, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>>>>> Am 28.03.2024 um 08:09 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe you like my 'book'
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TH
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   From your book, the following quote
>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>> This project was started as a search for the connection between QM and
>>>>>>> GR. The connection was hypothesized and assumed to exist (without
>>>>>>> knowing it's specific features), since nature has to be understood as an
>>>>>>> undivided system. So all theories should describe the same world, but
>>>>>>> possibly different aspects. Spacetime is a physical system, hence should
>>>>>>> be build out of 'elements' (what are the 'building blocks'). ***
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any connection between two theoretical (conjectural, impractical as yet)
>>>>>>> notions as QM and GR must necessarily be theoretical as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you try to find a way between to spots (let's call them 'QM' and
>>>>>> 'GR'), you need to assume, those spots do in fact exist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not the duty of the pathfinder, to prove the existence of the two
>>>>>> endpoints of the way found.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If there is actually nothing at these positions, it's actually not his
>>>>>> fault.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In theory, the Moon is green cheese with cows jumping over it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, not really. At least I've never heard of such a theory.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> People were burnt to death for not believing that the stars moved in
>>>>>>> crystal spheres, and the stars were holes in those spheres to let
>>>>>>> heavenly light in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, that's not quite true, neither.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unfortunately, the catholic church had killed several scientists in
>>>>>> the middle ages, but not because of their discoveries, but because
>>>>>> they were questioning the authority of the church.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That authority was meant to be absolute and ANY disobedience could be
>>>>>> punished by death.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This has changed significantly and today the pope does not intervene
>>>>>> in physics anymore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The justification for QM and GR as practical let alone scientific is not
>>>>>>> there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, yes, because that was NOT my topic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While there is charm in seeing the moon as green cheese with cows
>>>>>>> jumping around it, and there is profit in all the heaven stuff, I see
>>>>>>> neither pleasure nor profit from QM and GR, save for the careerists and
>>>>>>> their dupes blown by math mumbo-jumbo. I know this is the most powerful
>>>>>>> nonsense ever to be globally accepted, in our times, and that deserves
>>>>>>> respect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You may rightfully critizise QM and GR, and in a way I would
>>>>>> understand you, but this was not the subject of my 'book'.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Those really into physics better study my videos and texts relating to
>>>>>>> physics. The US Navy, I find, has appropriated my new design rail gun
>>>>>>> for their ships. The Chinese are using a version of that to launch their
>>>>>>> warplanes from navy carriers. Facebook is so useful, to present new
>>>>>>> discoveries and inventions, and see how they get stolen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You invented the railgun? ? ? ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I invented a new design railgun, where the bullet is heavy,
>>>>> perpendicular to the rails, and the voltage is low. Overall, this design
>>>>> is 10-100 more efficient than the earlier rail guns of the US as shown
>>>>> in their pre 2015 videos. So it is practical and has been known since my
>>>>> first paper on it in 2013. I showed that to my PhD supervisor in 2015,
>>>>> and I suspect that it was transmitted to the relevant people from that
>>>>> time. In 2017 I published the details of the invention in a series of
>>>>> youtube videos.
>>>>> My idea behind my PhD work (btw I am not a PhD as in the final viva they
>>>>> said I had not made a working model of a rail gun, which was not what my
>>>>> supervisor had been saying) was to show that the Lorentz force
>>>>> accelerating the bullet had no ELECTRICAL reaction.  (Since I have used
>>>>> a rolling bullet/armature in my videos, there is apparently some
>>>>> reaction but that is mechanical, due to the treadmill effect.) My
>>>>> detailed analysis shows inertia violation.
>>>>
>>>> I had always thought, that my 'book' was 'revolutionary'.
>>>>
>>>> But your research is far more revolutionary than mine.
>>>
>>> The research period was from 1998 - 2015.  It is development time now.
>>> Thanks very much.
>>>>
>>>> So, hope the best for you, but see trouble ahead, because you are
>>>> stepping on a lot of feet.
>>>
>>> Never a truer word was said.  I am glad that at least one physicist in the
>>> universe is not mocking or ignoring me.  That is a start.
>>>>
>>>> It's interesting, anyhow.
>>>
>>> Well, it will take a lot of money to make a working prototype of an
>>> internal force machine that will replace all rockets and jet engines.
>>> How I can earn that money, is my present concern.  Let us see if my next
>>> project (making a very cheap "free energy" drive) works as my
>>> maths/intuition says is should. I have found no patents for that, and that
>>> is good.
>>>>
>>>> btw: I had 'published' my 'book' as google doc presentation, which
>>>> worked quite well.
>>>
>>> My book "To the Stars" was published in Jan 2000 in my new "adda" website.
>>> I presented my new formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) to explain mass and energy
>>> relationships on a kinetic and non-destructive basis. It got some
>>> attention when in 2003 there was a global news release about this work
>>> relating to updating Newtonian laws, with deliberate inertia violation
>>> using Lorentz force, it that had no reaction.  Had I been taken seriously
>>> then, we would have been making daily trips to the Moon by now, and
>>> gearing up for space mining, etc.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately for "modern physicists", as I right (from my inertia
>>> violation experiments) they are all wrong. I don't expect them to like
>>> being wrong, so resistance from their side is to be expected.  I can only
>>> appeal to their commitment to the scientific method, which has it that all
>>> knowledge is provisional, and so subject to revision or expulsion.
>>>
>>> Look at the gains. Burning all the e=mcc=hv stuff and updating physics
>>> will create plenty of jobs for physicists and engineers, for all time to
>>> come!  No end of learning and finding, with new machines always going for
>>> new things.  Why stick to the old and rotten, the senseless and the
>>> constricting? May truth overcome the cunning of the globally established
>>> liars. With my physics, the universe gets infinite like human potential.
>>> Courage!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Arindam Banerjee
>>>
>>> The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
>>> Arindam Banerjee,
>>> HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
>>> 10 Nov 2023
>>> (All rights reserved)
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
>>>
>>> ***
>>>
>>> Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>>>
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========