Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<ppmp4jd81vnqkel231vlqnmigmqimmun3n@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!news.szaf.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: George Coyne and Richard Dawkins Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 18:39:17 +0100 Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com Lines: 60 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <ppmp4jd81vnqkel231vlqnmigmqimmun3n@4ax.com> References: <868r044fxr.fsf@example.com> <o0po4jdontahdtsuefikj5eeojavt2lfd6@4ax.com> <86v8375w3b.fsf@example.com> <rrso4j1p2nsv1a3462p2hgl3enkr4i2unm@4ax.com> <868r03mflw.fsf@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="13809"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Return-Path: <news-admin@admin.omicronmedia.com> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id C14A6229870; Tue, 21 May 2024 13:39:06 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A306622986E for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Tue, 21 May 2024 13:39:04 -0400 (EDT) id A5C157D11E; Tue, 21 May 2024 17:39:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org by mod-relay.zaccari.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A88C7D009 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 21 May 2024 17:39:21 +0000 (UTC) by nntpmail01.ams1.omicronmedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 769D42019D8 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 21 May 2024 17:39:19 +0000 (UTC) id 3E12520C01D8; Tue, 21 May 2024 17:39:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Path: fx13.ams1.POSTED!not-for-mail X-Original-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com X-NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 17:39:17 UTC Bytes: 4826 On Tue, 21 May 2024 14:58:19 +0100, Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> wrote: >Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Tue, 21 May 2024 10:54:16 +0100, Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> wrote: >> >>>Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> On Mon, 20 May 2024 17:16:16 +0100, Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>In this interview, at the point I link to: >>>>> >>>>>https://youtu.be/68ejfHahFK4?t=254 >>>>> >>>>>Father Coyne offers Neodarwinian Evolution as an explanation for, >>>>>among other things, the origin of the universe. And Professor >>>>>Dawkins agrees with him. How does evolution of any kind have >>>>>anything to do with the origin of the universe? surely it would need >>>>>something to evolve from? >>>> >>>> I got the impression that he was using "evolution" in a wider sense >>>> than just *biological* evolution, that life itself "evolved" from >>>> chemical reactions. >>> >>>I suppose you could interpret "origin of the universe" as "origin of >>>the content of the universe" and then say that it evolved from pure >>>energy. But I am not sure if that is evolution strictly, or just >>>changing from one thing to another. And I am not sure if energy is >>>different from content, or if universe is different from content of >>>the universe. In summary, I am not sure. >> >> When talking about a subject in what is essentially a metaphysical >> way. I think we shouldn't get too hung up on the precise meaning of >> specific words, it's the ideas behind the words that matter. >> >>> >>>> >>>> A fascinating interview that I had not seen before, thanks for the >>>> link. Whilst I was aware of George Coyne, I never really explored >>>> his ideas before and I was fascinated by how much what he was saying >>>> echoed my own beliefs and ideas - there was nothing he said that I >>>> would argue with and I thought he handled Dawkins extremely well. >>> >>>The TV series from which it was excluded was quite entertaining. I >>>think in that series Dawkins was struggling to keep the lid on his >>>temper at times, although that could just be his natural expression. >> >> I wasn't aware of that series. Any idea why this episode was excluded? > >At the beginning of the video Dawkins explains that it was left out as >there was too much overlap with an interview with the Archbishop of >Canterbury. OK, I forgot that your link started ~4 mins in. I'll be interested to hunt down the Archbishop of Canterbury episode, but I'd expect it to have a lot of overlap with George Coyne. I think that a lot of USians make the mistake of regarding the likes of Ken Ham as a representative of mainstream Christianity when he isn't - at least not outside the USA!