Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 20:36:20 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New Level
References: <utbtok$pkre$10@dont-email.me> <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-79E7CE.10142621032024@news.giganews.com> <17bf2142c28c7c76$917$1588242$4cd50660@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS
Message-ID: <sR2dnWtJhaBZdmD4nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@giganews.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 20:36:20 +0000
Lines: 55
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-IBw1QKxC6SgnN/eSGfXJPe+sHtXZ1A6bKojvo7v34LEhOFDv5pBr8FINFcFGDj4J1V9OattOZWhAAxl!mO63OqT3VPhMT0J3VCKcPyQ1hEM92egN2X1ijn3zXQlRYl3GLpWx05hTusL1dtifevKH1hvHNihR
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3664

On Mar 22, 2024 at 8:55:51 AM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:

> On 3/21/2024 1:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>  In article <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>,
>>    moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>  
>>>  On 3/21/2024 11:04 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>>  On 3/20/24 10:42 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>>>  On 3/20/2024 7:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>  On Mar 20, 2024 at 3:15:33 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman""
>>>>>>  <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>  Mar 19, 2024 at 8:26:17 PM PDT, super70s
>>>>>>>>  <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>  On 2024-03-20 02:46:53 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>>>>>>>>>>  What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still
>>>>>>>>>>  unauthorized?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  Lie: The rioters were invited into the Capitol by police
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  There is clear video of the police holding the door open for people
>>>>>>>>  who were later found guilty of unauthorized entry.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  How does that logically hold up?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  With that evidence, why wasn't the charge of unauthorized entry
>>>>>>>  withdrawn or dismissed? Seems to me that both the prosecution and judge
>>>>>>>  were obligated to do so.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  One would think. Obviously this only applies to a very small number
>>>>>>  of people who were there that day but for those to whom it did apply,
>>>>>>  it seems that as a matter of law one cannot be guilty of unauthorized
>>>>>>  entry if the people in charge of authorizing you let you in.
>>>>> 
>>>>>  Indeed. Not if one remains in the area he was let into.
>>>> 
>>>>  Jesus, pig... you don't believe that shit do you?  Judges and juries
>>>>  sure didn't.
>>>> 
>>>>  https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/04/politics/fact-check-capitol-insurrection-janu
>>>>  ary-6-lies/index.html
>>> 
>>>  I believe pretty much that whole article, including the admission that a
>>>  couple of police might've allowed a couple of rioters in.  But what I
>>>  was addressing is the fact that allowing them into the building doesn't
>>>  equate to allowing them into Pelosi's office to shit on her desk.
>>  
>>  Which would be relevant if the people who were let in were actually the
>>  desk-sitters.
> 
> So, the guilt-threshold requires matching a rioter's DNA to his feces?

It requires matching the crime to the actual person who did it.