Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!zrD2tr+/eVT9kFYXPhpyaQ.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Vincent Thiernesse" <vincent.thiernesse@sfr.fr>
Newsgroups: fr.sci.electronique
Subject: Re: Detecteur presence
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 22:34:17 +0200
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <tbf1e4$1q8v$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <-fJspq4J8pf6YxyeXvaFHuDWvuU@jntp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="utf-8";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="59679"; posting-host="zrD2tr+/eVT9kFYXPhpyaQ.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220629-4, 6/29/2022), Outbound message
Importance: Normal
Bytes: 1360
X-Original-Lines: 1


>Avez-vous des infos là dessus, est-ce le même principe que les radars ?
>Est-ce plus fiable qu'un PIR ?

Les détecteurs RF, c'est PIR !

Vin 


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus