Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<usedjj$1i92b$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: OT: A lot better than a Covid death shot!
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 18:09:27 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <usedjj$1i92b$2@dont-email.me>
References: <ii4juitohro4svdn5d8auajn9bvvb9j7oj@4ax.com>
 <ns6cnUVBU4EWB3T4nZ2dnZeNn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <usc974$11v8a$1@solani.org>
 <9fjjuid0i28o79c3nvlhuuao81ffqthv22@4ax.com> <uscl4a$13suf$1@dont-email.me>
 <usclep$13shm$1@dont-email.me> <uscllt$13taq$1@dont-email.me>
 <uscukk$15vjb$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 07:09:40 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9c1b1c545e53ec7daf7071b041912250";
	logging-data="1647691"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Out9E/tdaeK3bSI686C3iC4ZI6AcWb6g="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0gbvTYkV/kL+TBUXUf3KqTubZdU=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <uscukk$15vjb$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2563

On 8/03/2024 4:48 am, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 07/03/2024 15:15, GB wrote:
>> On 07/03/2024 15:11, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>> On 07/03/2024 15:05, Bill Sloman wrote:
>>>> There's not a shred of evidence that Covid-19 was any kind of 
>>>> laboratory-developed virus, and virus labs are actually pretty good 
>>>> at keeping dangerous viruses safely locked up. It's a stupid idea, 
>>>> but Cursitor Doom and Jan Panteltje like it.
>>>
>>> Actually its pretty much the main stream  consensus that the virus 
>>> was cooked up in a lab, and escaped.
>>>
>>
>> Is that the consensus amongst people who really know what they are 
>> talking about?
>>
>>
> As far as I know, yes.

But you don't know much, and don't go to any trouble to find out 
evidence that you'd prefer not to know about.

> https://oversight.house.gov/release/covid-origins-hearing-wrap-up-facts-science-evidence-point-to-a-wuhan-lab-leak%EF%BF%BC/
> 
> is a fairly good overview. The problem is that accusing China of being 
> uber sloppy was not politically *convenient*. So the default position 
> initially was a 'we just dont know'
> 
> Apparently now, we know a lot more...

But you can't point to any of this "new: information.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney