Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<usfe2e$1p8cg$7@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott2@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Refutation of the Peter Linz Halting Problem proof 2024-03-05
 --closure yet?--
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 10:23:42 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 86
Message-ID: <usfe2e$1p8cg$7@dont-email.me>
References: <us8shn$7g2d$1@dont-email.me> <us92f0$uvql$4@i2pn2.org>
 <us931e$8gmr$1@dont-email.me> <usa4rk$10ek4$3@i2pn2.org>
 <usa5to$gp0j$1@dont-email.me> <usa8lp$10ek5$5@i2pn2.org>
 <usa9o9$ho7b$1@dont-email.me> <usag21$118jg$1@i2pn2.org>
 <usanbu$klu7$1@dont-email.me> <usavv8$m3rv$5@dont-email.me>
 <usb0fh$m7mn$4@dont-email.me> <usbb7s$12dn0$1@i2pn2.org>
 <usbbtq$rneq$2@dont-email.me> <usbfjn$12dmv$7@i2pn2.org>
 <usbm60$tg2q$2@dont-email.me> <usbnb6$12dmv$16@i2pn2.org>
 <usbpb4$u2pm$1@dont-email.me> <usd6aa$150h1$2@i2pn2.org>
 <usd7im$17ufd$1@dont-email.me> <usdelo$15934$1@i2pn2.org>
 <usdh52$19t1n$1@dont-email.me> <usdq4p$1be15$5@dont-email.me>
 <usdseo$1bthk$1@dont-email.me> <usfdlv$1picd$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 16:23:42 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cbe692f823dc8310f00dd0aaf1f84978";
	logging-data="1876368"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/wIcaiCY4hwJ25hDQc2eKu"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Fv+kPRw+4fNPPsGrLqvbDwej2Wg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <usfdlv$1picd$3@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 5006

On 3/8/2024 10:17 AM, immibis wrote:
> On 8/03/24 03:16, olcott wrote:
>> On 3/7/2024 7:37 PM, immibis wrote:
>>> On 8/03/24 00:04, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 3/7/2024 4:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 3/7/24 12:20 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/7/2024 1:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/6/24 11:11 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/7/2024 12:37 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/6/24 10:17 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.Hq0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.Hqy ∞ // Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ halts
>>>>>>>>>> Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.Hq0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.Hqn     // Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ 
>>>>>>>>>> does not halt
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The design of Olcott Machines makes quite easy for Ĥ.H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩
>>>>>>>>>> to get its abort criteria.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Which doesn't match the Halting Problem requirements,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It does match the Halting Problem requirements, when
>>>>>>>> they are implemented indirectly as "abort criteria".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which is a different criteria, so you are just admitting that you 
>>>>>>> are using a strawman desception and thus INTENTIONALLY LYING.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Somehow you think lies are ok if they help you prove your false 
>>>>>>> statements.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Linz second ⊢* enables H to compute any damn
>>>>>> thing as long as this ends up computing halting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Note quite, it is whatever the algorithm for H generates.
>>>>>
>>>>> That exact same algorithm exists in H^.H, so that WILL get the same 
>>>>> answer, and since you logic says it doesn't, that means you are 
>>>>> lying that H^ was built by the specification, or as to what H will 
>>>>> actually do.
>>>>
>>>> *Already addressed in my reply to you here*
>>>> We finally know exactly how H1(D,D) derives a different result than 
>>>> H(D,D)
>>>>
>>>
>>> We know it's because H and H1 are different programs, not copies.
>>
>> *Even when we remove the infinite loop appended to Ĥ.Hqy*
>> Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.Hq0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.Hqy // Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ halts
>> Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.Hq0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.Hqn // Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ does not halt
>>
>> An Olcott machine Ĥ.H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ <Ĥ> could trivially determine
>> that it is calling itself in recursive simulation.
>>
>> and Olcott machine H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ <H> could trivially determine
>> that it is NOT calling itself in recursive simulation.
>>
>> This is true even when the embedded portion of H is
>> identical to <H>.
>>
> 
> The copy of
>    H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ <H>
> is not
>    Ĥ.H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ <Ĥ>
> 
> it is actually
>    Ĥ.H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ <H>
> 
> this is easily done by deleting <Ĥ> from the tape and inserting <H>
> 

Because my cancer came back too quickly (in less than 24 months)
I can't afford the time to diverge from Linz until I have closure
on Linz. I am on year 4.2 of a 50% five year mortality rate.

Ĥ.H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ <Ĥ> ⊢* Ĥ.Hqn
therefore
H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ <H> ⊢* H.qy

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer