Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New
 Level
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:59:54 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <utjoba$2sijg$2@dont-email.me>
References: <utbtok$pkre$10@dont-email.me>
 <p6mcnRxmu82A02f4nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <utdl0p$19mot$1@dont-email.me>
 <6NydnWwGgNc0xWf4nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <utfn65$1nrjb$1@dont-email.me>
 <J_SdnRPRtZzf6mb4nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <17bea7625eadf0f8$300665$2218499$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com>
 <uthi9p$29328$6@dont-email.me>
 <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>
 <atropos-79E7CE.10142621032024@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:59:54 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6a12f5494fe329ae11de877e3270d04b";
	logging-data="3033712"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/pVQwxQEDN/h1KX+ziSc+/"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ycmcpl4lfYGZwaOTvU30ks0sdJI=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <atropos-79E7CE.10142621032024@news.giganews.com>
Bytes: 4159

On 3/21/24 1:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>,
>   moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/21/2024 11:04 AM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 3/20/24 10:42 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>> On 3/20/2024 7:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> On Mar 20, 2024 at 3:15:33 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman""
>>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Mar 19, 2024 at 8:26:17 PM PDT, super70s
>>>>>>> <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-03-20 02:46:53 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>>>>>>>>> What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still
>>>>>>>>> unauthorized?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lie: The rioters were invited into the Capitol by police
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is clear video of the police holding the door open for people
>>>>>>> who were later found guilty of unauthorized entry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How does that logically hold up?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With that evidence, why wasn't the charge of unauthorized entry
>>>>>> withdrawn or dismissed? Seems to me that both the prosecution and judge
>>>>>> were obligated to do so.
>>>>>
>>>>> One would think. Obviously this only applies to a very small number
>>>>> of people who were there that day but for those to whom it did apply,
>>>>> it seems that as a matter of law one cannot be guilty of unauthorized
>>>>> entry if the people in charge of authorizing you let you in.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed. Not if one remains in the area he was let into.
>>>
>>> Jesus, pig... you don't believe that shit do you?  Judges and juries
>>> sure didn't.
>>>
>>> https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/04/politics/fact-check-capitol-insurrection-janu
>>> ary-6-lies/index.html
>>
>> I believe pretty much that whole article, including the admission that a
>> couple of police might've allowed a couple of rioters in.  But what I
>> was addressing is the fact that allowing them into the building doesn't
>> equate to allowing them into Pelosi's office to shit on her desk.
> 
> Which would be relevant if the people who were let in were actually the
> desk-sitters.
> 

Nobody was let in.  Broken doors and broken windows at the scene of an 
ongoing riot are hardly indicators that you have permission to be there.

-- 
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0