Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Re: Getting there at last...
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:31:26 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 296
Message-ID: <uuhitu$3c4p4$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1HWE6H1jV8YTvxfaaL7fnCCcpe8@jntp>
 <1bcd63e24f9d1f35a1aa7af1b44091d2@www.novabbs.org>
 <l67dnaFikkfU1@mid.individual.net>
 <b6043cf438f884321bf1b6aed55f9871@www.novabbs.org>
 <9YCpfbWayDDTVrmI9Yye1LKiThs@jntp> <l6kfsfFjqknU2@mid.individual.net>
 <WuhuOl-fQu3J7ho5vcxwxFwmlEQ@jntp> <l6puenFeh5pU1@mid.individual.net>
 <bigu1zNUD9n8JIWm2zHpTNzxgBQ@jntp> <l71kmnFje11U1@mid.individual.net>
 <AwNHa33OTto93tgHGw_X4ucJZ-Y@jntp> <660C3EF7.3876@ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 18:31:28 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4d8b8da5d55f5a03e28393cacdc89191";
	logging-data="3543844"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX184gvc0WMvbsKOH9yfDcCfO/mtP+h5Zb4U="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:v06rGnJZDpAZ6Zze8yxbTo/6ZvU=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <660C3EF7.3876@ix.netcom.com>
Bytes: 13117

On 4/2/2024 10:23 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>
>> Le 02/04/2024 à 16:51, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>> Am 30.03.2024 um 11:38 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
>>>> Le 30/03/2024 à 18:48, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>>>> Am 28.03.2024 um 08:09 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe you like my 'book'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TH
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   From your book, the following quote
>>>>>> ***
>>>>>> This project was started as a search for the connection between QM and
>>>>>> GR. The connection was hypothesized and assumed to exist (without
>>>>>> knowing it's specific features), since nature has to be understood as an
>>>>>> undivided system. So all theories should describe the same world, but
>>>>>> possibly different aspects. Spacetime is a physical system, hence should
>>>>>> be build out of 'elements' (what are the 'building blocks'). ***
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any connection between two theoretical (conjectural, impractical as yet)
>>>>>> notions as QM and GR must necessarily be theoretical as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you try to find a way between to spots (let's call them 'QM' and
>>>>> 'GR'), you need to assume, those spots do in fact exist.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not the duty of the pathfinder, to prove the existence of the two
>>>>> endpoints of the way found.
>>>>>
>>>>> If there is actually nothing at these positions, it's actually not his
>>>>> fault.
>>>>>
>>>>>> In theory, the Moon is green cheese with cows jumping over it.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, not really. At least I've never heard of such a theory.
>>>>>
>>>>>> People were burnt to death for not believing that the stars moved in
>>>>>> crystal spheres, and the stars were holes in those spheres to let
>>>>>> heavenly light in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, that's not quite true, neither.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, the catholic church had killed several scientists in
>>>>> the middle ages, but not because of their discoveries, but because
>>>>> they were questioning the authority of the church.
>>>>>
>>>>> That authority was meant to be absolute and ANY disobedience could be
>>>>> punished by death.
>>>>>
>>>>> This has changed significantly and today the pope does not intervene
>>>>> in physics anymore.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The justification for QM and GR as practical let alone scientific is not
>>>>>> there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, yes, because that was NOT my topic.
>>>>>
>>>>>> While there is charm in seeing the moon as green cheese with cows
>>>>>> jumping around it, and there is profit in all the heaven stuff, I see
>>>>>> neither pleasure nor profit from QM and GR, save for the careerists and
>>>>>> their dupes blown by math mumbo-jumbo. I know this is the most powerful
>>>>>> nonsense ever to be globally accepted, in our times, and that deserves
>>>>>> respect.
>>>>>
>>>>> You may rightfully critizise QM and GR, and in a way I would
>>>>> understand you, but this was not the subject of my 'book'.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Those really into physics better study my videos and texts relating to
>>>>>> physics. The US Navy, I find, has appropriated my new design rail gun
>>>>>> for their ships. The Chinese are using a version of that to launch their
>>>>>> warplanes from navy carriers. Facebook is so useful, to present new
>>>>>> discoveries and inventions, and see how they get stolen.
>>>>>
>>>>> You invented the railgun? ? ? ?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I invented a new design railgun, where the bullet is heavy,
>>>> perpendicular to the rails, and the voltage is low. Overall, this design
>>>> is 10-100 more efficient than the earlier rail guns of the US as shown
>>>> in their pre 2015 videos. So it is practical and has been known since my
>>>> first paper on it in 2013. I showed that to my PhD supervisor in 2015,
>>>> and I suspect that it was transmitted to the relevant people from that
>>>> time. In 2017 I published the details of the invention in a series of
>>>> youtube videos.
>>>> My idea behind my PhD work (btw I am not a PhD as in the final viva they
>>>> said I had not made a working model of a rail gun, which was not what my
>>>> supervisor had been saying) was to show that the Lorentz force
>>>> accelerating the bullet had no ELECTRICAL reaction.  (Since I have used
>>>> a rolling bullet/armature in my videos, there is apparently some
>>>> reaction but that is mechanical, due to the treadmill effect.) My
>>>> detailed analysis shows inertia violation.
>>>
>>> I had always thought, that my 'book' was 'revolutionary'.
>>>
>>> But your research is far more revolutionary than mine.
>>
>> The research period was from 1998 - 2015.  It is development time now.
>> Thanks very much.
>>>
>>> So, hope the best for you, but see trouble ahead, because you are
>>> stepping on a lot of feet.
>>
>> Never a truer word was said.  I am glad that at least one physicist in the
>> universe is not mocking or ignoring me.  That is a start.
>>>
>>> It's interesting, anyhow.
>>
>> Well, it will take a lot of money to make a working prototype of an
>> internal force machine that will replace all rockets and jet engines.
>> How I can earn that money, is my present concern.  Let us see if my next
>> project (making a very cheap "free energy" drive) works as my
>> maths/intuition says is should. I have found no patents for that, and that
>> is good.
>>>
>>> btw: I had 'published' my 'book' as google doc presentation, which
>>> worked quite well.
>>
>> My book "To the Stars" was published in Jan 2000 in my new "adda" website.
>> I presented my new formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) to explain mass and energy
>> relationships on a kinetic and non-destructive basis. It got some
>> attention when in 2003 there was a global news release about this work
>> relating to updating Newtonian laws, with deliberate inertia violation
>> using Lorentz force, it that had no reaction.  Had I been taken seriously
>> then, we would have been making daily trips to the Moon by now, and
>> gearing up for space mining, etc.
>>
>> Unfortunately for "modern physicists", as I right (from my inertia
>> violation experiments) they are all wrong. I don't expect them to like
>> being wrong, so resistance from their side is to be expected.  I can only
>> appeal to their commitment to the scientific method, which has it that all
>> knowledge is provisional, and so subject to revision or expulsion.
>>
>> Look at the gains. Burning all the e=mcc=hv stuff and updating physics
>> will create plenty of jobs for physicists and engineers, for all time to
>> come!  No end of learning and finding, with new machines always going for
>> new things.  Why stick to the old and rotten, the senseless and the
>> constricting? May truth overcome the cunning of the globally established
>> liars. With my physics, the universe gets infinite like human potential.
>> Courage!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Arindam Banerjee
>>
>> The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
>> Arindam Banerjee,
>> HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
>> 10 Nov 2023
>> (All rights reserved)
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
>>
>> ***
>>
>> Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>>
>> Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into near
>> space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========