Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Inconvenient lefties
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2024 23:34:04 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <uusm5c$2c31h$3@dont-email.me>
References: <utks3h$35980$1@dont-email.me> <0B2dnfnk4IawGI37nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <17c3b829d977a4bb$361$1351842$40d50a60@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-A4D504.11411606042024@kd014101080069.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp>
Injection-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 23:34:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8b35f3a82528bad77260edde5fd5a277";
	logging-data="2493489"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ePrzLji1TmoG822i+TYUDLy6VxmG87rM="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BlZHx8QRgHaz/+A9joloErCPmug=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 2342

BTR1701  <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>In article <17c3b829d977a4bb$361$1351842$40d50a60@news.newsdemon.com>,
> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4/5/2024 7:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> > On Apr 5, 2024 at 3:57:07 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>> > 
>> >> On 4/5/2024 4:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> >>>   moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>
>> >>>> What *opinion* -- of anything anywhere -- can't be contradicted?  Fyi,
>> >>>> *that* would be a violation of 'free speech'...
>> >>>   
>> >>> No one's muzzling or prohibiting you from making contradictory 
>> >>> statements regarding the SCOTUS ruling. However, your right to free
>> >>> speech doesn't immunize you from being wrong or bar others from pointing
>> >>> out your wrongness.
>> >>
>> >> ...where "wrongness" means "of differing opinion".
>> > 
>> > You can have an opinion that SCOTUS decided wrongly and wish it had made a
>> > different ruling but you can't have an opinion that the law is other than 
>> > it is.
>> 
>> The 'law' is what SCOTUS has opinions about. I can have *my* opinion 
>> about either or both. Therein, the only "wrong" would be a misquoting.
>
>No, the law is what it is and it's not what you claim. You can have your 
>own opinions but you can't have your own facts.

Aren't you quoting from the leftist legacy news media?